 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

|
 |
 |
 |
PROJECTS
FOR THE MISSING CURRICULUM
There is a close relationship between the Hidden Curriculum and the
Missing Curriculum. Analysis of the messages embodied within the hidden
curriculum often suggests underrepresented artists and ideas that
ought to be researched and included. Understanding what is missing
in the curriculum may also take the form of seriously considering
whether important social issues related to contemporary visual culture
are investigated within the art program.
At Spiral Workshop we consider four components when designing a project.
Each project should
(1) deal with an issue of developmental importance to the students,
(2) be based on a contemporary social theme,
(3) include examples of past and recent artworks that have explored
these themes, and (4) teach a method (conceptual and/or technical)
for constructing works of art.
Hated Body Parts* is a sculpture project developed because we recognized
that though self-portraiture and drawing the human figure are both
included in most art curricula, the two are usually never joined.
(Students image their faces, rarely or never their own bodies.) The
plethora of news reports about dieting and eating disorders suggests
that the body is an important concern in contemporary culture; clearly
body image is a major issue for many teens; there is much contemporary
art which reconsiders the naturalness of many conceptions of the human
body.
Each student chose a body part about which he or she had obsessed
or felt special concern. After drawing and writing about this part
of their bodies, the students created plaster carvings of their "problem
area"--an amusing variation of the tradition of copying "perfect,"
classically formed body parts. The resulting sculptures gave interesting
insights into how students related to their own bodies; many pieces
were funny and ironic; some were quite poignant. The final piece was
a collaborative installation of bas relief sculptures and texts in
which students created a safe space to discuss feelings about their
bodies.
Assigning students to make a "self-portrait" collage by
gathering and arranging magazine images which "represent"
themselves is a commonly used project. It would be more accurate and
educational to first analyze with students the conditions under which
magazine images are created and circulated and then say, "Choose
from this highly preselected bank of images."
Surely a comprehensive contemporary art education must include study
of the "hyperreality" of wildly proliferating images that
creates the environment in which we live, work, and create.
The biggest taboo in the school art curriculum
today is not nudity or eroticism. It is foregrounding that the main
use of images in this culture is to turn human beings into consumers
by turning everyday things (soap, shoes, stoves, cars, or whatever)
into objects of desire.
Spiral Workshop created a project appropriately called Stuff ** that
encourages students to explore their relationship to consumer desire.
We ask students to go through magazines (and/or search the internet)
and to trace and gather pictures of things they want. After looking
at the book Material World
that shows families from around the world standing in front of their
homes with all their possessions, we ask each student to think about
how he or she uses things as a component in constructing an idealized
self.
Students fill out worksheets that collect stories about pleasure,
desire, and disappointment. "List 3 things you wanted, but never
got. List something you wanted--then you got--then you disliked. List
5 reasons why you might want something. Pick one thing you really
want and explain why you want it. Tell a story of when you were jealous
of something someone else got."
Students enjoy discussing past clothing and toy fads--things they
wanted "way back then" that seem silly and useless now.
Such discussions begin to give them perspective on the socially constructed
nature of their desires.
As the project evolves students combine layers
of tracings, photographic images of things, and images or drawings
of themselves, as well as handwritten or found texts, creating a self-portrait
that explores how identity is interwoven with possession.
The purpose of this a project is not to unilaterally condemn the pleasures
of material existence, but to encourage students to explore the cultural
conditions that frame questions of identity and to consider how this
may be different from peoples experiences at other times and
places. Most currently taught self-portrait projects rely on staring
in the mirror and drawingsuggesting that the route to developing
a sense of self is the same today as it was in the time of the Rembrandt.
As teachers we can develop interesting projects that encourage students
to neither exclude nor to glorify the products of contemporary commercial
culture, but rather to see them as components In the formation of
contemporary identity.
Reconsider your current curriculum. Try to see the portrait the curriculum
paints of the world.
If this portrait is not as interesting,
complex, and contradictory as the world in which you live--analyze,
edit, contextualize, and invent projects and fresh curricular approaches.
Professors and politicians wrangle about who makes the canon and what
should be in the curriculum. While theyre still talking, art
teachers can design and teach the curriculum that creates tomorrows
citizens and tomorrows culture.
*Hated Body Parts project was developed
in the 1997 Spiral Workshop by Christine Burns, Nicole Lombardi, and
Olivia Gude.
**Stuff project was developed in the 1997 Spiral Workshop by Cristie
Bosch, Karen Wilberg, and Olivia Gude.
REFERENCES
Gablik, S. (1992). The Reenchantment
ofArt. London: Thames and Hudson.
Nochlin, L. (1971). Why have there been no great women artists? In
T.Hess & E. Baker, eds., Art
and Sexual Politics (pp. 1-44). New York: Collier. Originally
published in ARTnews, January 1971, pp. 22-39, 67-71. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
1.
Installation view of Hated Body Parts project from Spiral Workshop
1997.
2. Bolivar Ortiz decided to concentrate on his nosedistinguished
or too prominent?
3. Feet and Nose
by Ted Jackle
4. Hand?
by Cindy Yau |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
1.
Things of Desire
by Luis Monterroso, 1997, a Stuff project
2.Stuff project by a student at Lincoln Middle School in Berwyn, 1998.
Teacher Arlette Wasik
3. Happiness Explodes
by Sofia Khalil, 1997, a Stuff project |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|