VPS- < VO < VPS+
Figure 1.
Let's find VO = f(VS)
KCL at V-:
(V- - VS) /R1 + (V- - VO) /RF = 0
Note that in this case V+ = 0! So,
V- = V+ = 0. So,
VO = -(RF /R1)VS. Note that the value of RL does not matter!
Let VS be a triangle wave with peaks at +2 and -2. See Figure 2. Let
RF = 6K and
RF = 2K. So,
VO = -(6K / 2K)VS is an "upside down" triangle 3 times taller than VS. So, the peaks of VO are at +6 and -6. See Figure 2.
If VPS- = -10 Volts and VPS+ = +10 Volts then the output voltage VO is well within the power supply limits and linear amplification does indeed take place as seen in Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Now let VS be a triangle wave with peaks at +2 and -2. See Figure 3. Let
RF = 12K and
RF = 2K. So,
VO = -(12K / 2K)VS is an "upside down" triangle 6 times taller than VS. So, the peaks of VO should be at +12 and -12.
But If VPS- = -10 Volts and VPS+ = +10 Volts then the output voltage VO tries to exceed the power supply limits. When the output tries to go beyond the power supply limits we say that the op-amp is "in saturation." Linear amplification does not take place when the op-amp is in saturation. Output values are "clipped" at the supply values as seen in Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Since the circuit in Figure 4. has negative feedback the above assumptions are true.
Let's find VO = f(V1, V2)
KCL at V-:
(V- - V1) /R1 + (V- - V2) /R2 + (V- - VO) /RF = 0
Note that since the current I+ = 0 then there is no voltage across RX ! So, V+ = 0
But V- = V+ = 0 So,
VO = -[(RF /R1)V1 + (RF /R2)V2)]
Figure 5.
Since the circuit in Figure 5 has negative feedback the above assumptions are true.
(V- - 0) /R1 + (V- - VO) /RF = 0
But V- = V+ = VS So,
VO = (RF /R1 + 1)VS
Figure 6.
Since the circuit in Figure 6. has negative feedback the above assumptions are true.
By inspection
VO = V- = V+ = VS
We say that the output voltage follows the input voltage. They are in phase and have the same magnitude.
Figure 7.
Can you show that
VO = [(RF /R1) + 1)*(RX /(RX + RY))]VS2 - [RF /R1]VS1 ??
Note that if all the resistors are the same value then
VO = VS2 - VS1 !
Figure 8.
Find VO first using the same procedures as in the inverting amplifier configuration. Then find IO by writing a KCL equation at VO using the KNOWN VALUE of VO and V- that you just calculated.
KCL at VO:
IO = (VO - V-) /RF + VO /RL
Note that since the current I+ = 0 then there is no voltage across R2 ! So, V+ = 0
Can you find VO = f(VS) for the circuit in Figure 9?
Figure 9.
End Operational Amplifiers Page
Last modified: Sun Oct 22 13:37:58 2000