Introduction to Philosophy
Prof. Walter Edelberg
Philosophy 100
UIC Fall 2000
 
Study Questions on René Descartes, Meditations I and II


Remark. The assignment is to read the Synopsis, Meditation I, and part of Meditation II of René Descartes' Meditations. Specifically, you should read pp.149 -156 (only to the last full ¶ on bottom of p. 156).

1.  At the beginning of Meditation I, Descartes says that he is going to "rid [himself] of all the opinions which [he] had formerly accepted." (Descartes, 151) Why on earth would anybody want to do that? (See both the Synopsis, pp. 149-151, and Meditation I for the answer.)
2. What strategy does Descartes say he is going to use, in performing this task? To "rid himself" of all these opinions, does he think he needs to show they are all false, or something weaker than that? Does he think he needs to take up each belief individually, or is there a way to process hoards of them at a time?
3.  The first doubt that Descartes brings forward concerns the testimony of his senses. What are the premises of this argument? What is its conclusion? If the premises were true, would the conclusion have to be true, too?
4. The second doubt that Descartes brings forward begins with the fact that he sometimes dreams. What beliefs does he think are called into doubt by this argument? Which of his beliefs does he suggest are left untouched by the Dream Argument, and why does he conjecture that the Dream argument leaves them unscathed? What name does he give to the things these beliefs are about? Which disciplines investigate these things?
5. The third doubt that Descartes brings forward begins with his belief in God. What additional beliefs does Descartes mean to call into doubt by this argument, and how? What objection does he consider, and how does he reply to it?
6. The fourth doubt that Descartes brings forward starts with the possibility that God does not exist. What further beliefs does Descartes mean to call into doubt by this argument, and how?
7. In the last paragraph of Meditation I, Descartes says "I shall then suppose, not that God who is supremely good and the fountain of youth, but some evil genius not less powerful than deceitful, has employed his whole energies in deceiving me . . ." (Descartes, 153) This supposition is not being used to call any further beliefs into doubt. What, then is its purpose?
8. In Meditation II, Descartes finally arrives at something he takes to be known with absolute certainty. What is it? How does he claim to know it with such absolute certainty? Does this prove the existence of at least one material object? Why or why not?