Phil 102 Fall 2004 – Quiz Four Practice: Mostly Quantifiers

Note: Modified 11/17/04


As usual, you will also be tested on previous material as well – I'd make sure that you can do problems like those on the previous quiz. There's also plenty of problems in the book – pretty much all of the problems in the sections of Ch 4 and 6 that we read have arguments to work on (some valid and some invalid).

1.  Translate the following between colloquial English and the language of TW as appropriate:

(i) b is neither a medium cube nor a large tetrahedron.

(ii) There is a dodecahedron adjoining c.

(iii) Only if there is a dodecahedron adjoining c is c a cube.

(iv) c is between b and a large cube.

(v) If b is not in back of c then nothing is.

(vi) All the small dodecahedra are behind c.

(vii) Ez(Small(z) ^ Dodec(z) ^ Behind(z, c))

(viii) Not all the small dodecahedra are behind c.

(ix) No small dodecahedra are behind c.

(x) All the cubes being large is a necessary condition for everything being large.

 

2. Evaluate the truth-values of the following in World A:

(i) ExCube(x) –> AxCube(x)

(ii) Ex(Cube(x) ^ RightOf(a,x))

(iii) Ex(Cube(x) ^ RightOf(x,a))

(iv) Ax((Dodec(x) ^ Small(x)) –> Adjoins(x,b))

(v) Ex(Cube(x) ^ Dodec(x))

world


3. Give formal proofs of the following (you could also do truth tables and informal proofs for practice):

(i) P ^ Q, (P –> R) v (Q –> R) therefore R 

(ii) P –> (Q –> R) therefore (P ^ Q) –> R

(iii) P –> Q, Q –> R, ¬R therefore ¬P

(iv) P –> Q therefore P –> (Q v R)

(v) P ^ (Q v R) therefore (P ^ Q) v (P ^ R)

(vi) ¬(¬P v ¬Q) therefore P ^ Q


Solutions

Back to Quiz page

Back to 102 home page