Phil 105: Science and Philosophy - Fall 2004 Lectures
!You will be sorely disappointed if you think that these are a
substitute for attending class!
Topic Three. What is Space?
Previous Lecture
Lecture 14 – Is Handedness an Intrinsic or Extrinsic Property?
(10/13/04)
1. Fitting Theory – handedness is
extrinsic
- Why can't the relationist about space accept an intrinsic account
of left vs right – of 'handedness'?
- The 'fitting theory' is the extrinsic account that the
relationist needs.
- I'd say it's a plausible account of handedness even if you are
absolutist about space.
- We'll describe it by looking at idealised worlds, and how the
fitting account explains left-right in that world; the claim is that
the left and right mean the same thing for real objects.
- Would it change the handedness of anything if we started calling
all the left-handed bodies 'right-handed' and v.v.?
- World 1 contains only similar hands:
- (i) form (mentally) the hands into two sets of mutually
congruent hands
- (ii) call one 'left' and one 'right'
- World 2 contains in addition, smaller hands, fists and glovesof
the same size as the original hands, and screws:
- (i) form each kind into two sets of mutually congruent bodies
- (ii) form two collections, each containing one of the sets of
each kind – two collections of things that mutually fit together.
- (iii) call on 'left' and one 'right'
- Claim: There's nothing about being 'left' or 'right' that is left
out – in this ideal world.
- Claim: Being left or right essentially amounts to nothing more
for real objects in our world.
2. Kant's objection – handedness must
be intrinsic
- Kant: Consider a universe in which the only object is a hand:
- it must be either left or right
- there only are internal relations in such a world
- so the difference can't depend on external, extrinsic relations
- the difference must be intrinsic.
- Again, why can't the difference be understood in terms of
internal, relations, intrinsic to the hand?
A universe that contains only a hand! (Our universe is probably an
enantiomorph – there is no mirror image of our world in the universe
– so incongruent to its counterpart, and so Kant's example isn't so
fanciful.)
- What is the handedness of a lone hand according to the fitting
account? Are there two possible lone hands?
- Kant: there must be two possible hands (one left and one right),
because if one introduced a body, the hand could only fit on one wrist.
Kant: the lone hand must be either left or right before the body is
introduced, because it fits exactly one hand
- How can we understand why there are two possibilities in terms of
the fitting account?
Next Lecture
Lecture Index
Back to Phil 105 home page