Phil 105: Science and Philosophy - Fall 2004 Lectures
!You will be sorely disappointed if you think that these are a substitute
for attending class!
Topic Five: Spacetime
Lecture 21 – Relativity of Simultaneity (11/8/04): Thorne Ch 1
1. Simultaneity
- Absolute Newtonian
simultaneity – gravity is instantaneous.
- Everyday simultaneity:
- Under what conditions do our normal judgements of simultaneity
get made, and compared?
- What about under very different conditions? Very distant events
or for people with very fast relative speeds?
2. Not
relativity
- Einstein's relativity of simultaneity is not
(merely) the trivial point that different people hear/see the same events
in different orders.
- It is that the same events really
occur in different orders depending on their motions.
Suppose two guns (at the points marked 'bang') are fired simultaneously
(absolutely if space is absolute, or relative to 2 in relativity), and suppose
6 passes 2 as the light from the muzzle flashes arrives, 5 when the bullets
arrive, and 6 when the sound of the firing arrives.
- Consider two guns fired simultaneously at each other, observed by
six observers, each with different positions and/or motions – with or
without relativity they will have the following experiences:
- 1 hears the left gun before 2 who hears it before 3.
- 3 hears the right gun before 2 who hears it before 1.
- 1 hears the left gun before the right gun – and v.v. for 3, while 2 hears them simultaneously.
- Ditto for the arrival of the bullets and seeing the muzzel flash.
- 4 hears the bangs simultaneously.
- Both bullets arrive simultaneously at 5.
- 6 sees both muzzle flashes at once.
- In other words:
- The different order in which signals arrive is not relativity.
- Even in relativity, two observers that meeting at a time and place
will perceive exactly the same events at that time.
- Generally, relativity is about how things are, not (just) how they
'seem' to people.
3. (Non-relativistic) Bullets:
- They have different speeds relative to different frames!
- Suppose a gun mounted at the center of a train car is fired at
a target fixed to the end, Lm away: if it taskes Ts then its speed is L/T
m/s.
- If the train moves at Vm/s relative to the ground then the bullet
Ts to travel (L + TV)m to the target. Why? So its speed is (L + TV)/T m/s
= L/T + V m/s – the speed relative to the train, plus the speed of the train.
- I.e., the bullet travels a different distance in each 'frame',
but at different speeds, so it takes the same time.
- If they arrive simultaneously in one frame then they do in all frames!
- Suppose a second gun at the center simultaneously fires at a target
Lm away at the other end: assuming this bullet travels at the same speed as
the first, then they will arrive simultaneously.
- Relative to the ground:
- the forward travelling bullet has speed L/T + V m/s, while by
similar reasoning the speed of the second is L/T - V m/s.
- the distance to the forward target is (L + TV)m so the time to
reach it is (L + TV)/(L/T + V) = Ts.
- the distance to the rear target is (L - TV)m so the time to reach
it is (L - TV)/(L/T - V) = Ts.
- That is, relative to the train and relative to the ground, the
bullets reach their targets simultaneously – although the distances to be
covered are different, so are the speeds, by just the right amount.
4. (Relativistic) Light – the kind
that exists:
- Completely unlike
bullets, all light has the same speed (300,000,000 m/s) in all directions
in all frames regardless of its source – the constancy of the speed of
light
- Experimental fact.
- Fact about the laws of physics.
- How is this possible? Suppose different frames are in disagreement,
not just about how far light travels from source to target, but how long it
takes…
5. Relativity of Simultaneity
- Repeat the bullet experiment with lamps instead of guns, and light
instead of bullets.
- Again the light reaches the ends of the car simultaneously in the
frame of the train.
- But relative to the ground
- because of the constancy of the speed of light, the very same
light travels in both directions at the same speed
- but because of the motion of the train it travels less distance
to the rear than front
- hence it reaches the rear before the front
- The arrival of the light at each end is simultaneous in the train
frame but not in the ground frame.
- We can generalize: if two events at distant places are simultaneous
relative to one standard of rest, they will not be relative to other standards
of rest.
- We can always hypothetically place lamps between the places and turn
them on at just the right time so that light arrives just as the two events
occur – sine the frames disagree about whether the light arrives simultaneously,
they disagree about whether the events occur simultaneously.
- Let us just highlight a 'logical truth' if two events occur at the
same place and time in one frame, then they do in all.
Next Lecture
Lecture Index
Back to Phil 105 home page