Pick one of the following paper topics and write a 4-5 pg. paper. Due December 6^th

1. Explain how Meyers overcomes both the skeptic’s position and the problem of the phenomenology of decisions. First, explain what each is and how they are challenges to autonomy and authenticity. Next explain how Meyers responds. Finally, do you think she is successful or not? Why? Some questions you might want to consider are as follows (in no specific order or degree of necessity). What is the significance of the "wedge of options"? What are some of the barriers to authenticity that intersectional identities face? What is the relationship between those barriers and the decisions agents make? Why is it important to use an intersectional model to frame one’s identity?

 

2. Anzaldua does not think of language as mere medium through which information is transmitted. How does she conceive of language? What is the significance of this conception of language to the traditions of silence and linguistic terrorism that Spanish speakers face in the USA? (Note: you must first explain "traditions of silence" and "linguistic terrorism.") What impact, if any, does this have on the autonomy and/or authenticity of an agent? Why or why not?

 

3. What, according to Anzaldua, are the origins of moral deviancy and how is it related to the difference between convergent and divergent thinking? What is the relationship between these two modes of consciousness and the distinction operating throughout Anzaldua’s work between essentialism and tolerance/ambiguity? Why would Meyers never accept ambiguity as a way of overcoming socially inflicted claims of moral deviancy? Which position do you think is correct? Why?

 

4. How does Santiago Baca make use of poetry to enhance self-worth and struggle against the threats of alienation and domination? (note: first clearly explain the threats) How does the practice of poetry support his identity in the tension between the Mind and El Corazon? (note: explain the relationship between identity and the Mind and El Corazon) Does this help him form an authentic identity or enhance is autonomy? If yes, how? If no, why not? Explain and defend your view.

 

5. Early in his sentence, Santiago Baca recognized that the informal prison code dictates that respect is earned through physical fighting as well as holding up well under punishment (c.f. isolation, etc.). Early on he even enjoyed the benefits of this system (as many people outside of prison do). Yet later he holds the position that the struggle for self-determination could never occur through his ability to fight? Was he right? If yes, explain why. If no, explain why not. (note: this question is essentially about the relationships between respect, identity, and self-determination. A satisfactory answer will have to outline each of these as they relate to Baca’s shift in position.)

 

6. The early Benson promotes a strong substantive view of autonomy in which normative competency is required for autonomy in order to deal with internalized oppression. Is he successful? Why or why not? Explain.