Physics 450 - Problem Set 2
Solutions - February 13 2001
1. (a) Note that
| (¶2/¶x2)
e-ax2 = (¶/¶x)
(-2ax) e-ax2
= (-2 a+ 4 a2
x2) e-ax2 |
|
and so plugging in a = -1/(4Dt)
gives:
| (¶2/¶x2)
e-x2/(4Dt) = [ -1/(2Dt)
+ x2/(4D2t2) ] e-x2/(4Dt) |
|
Next compute
| (¶/¶t)
t-1/2 e-x2/(4Dt)
= [-t-3/2/2
+ x2 / (4Dt5/2) ] e-x2/(4Dt) |
|
A bit more algebra shows that
| (¶/ ¶t
- D ¶2
/ ¶x2)t-1/2
e-x2/(4Dt) = 0 |
|
(b) We need to compute
|
ó
õ |
-¥
-¥ |
dx t-1/2
e-x2/(4Dt) = t-1/2
(2 p×2Dt)1/2 = 2 D1/2 |
|
i.e. constant in time. Here we have used the most important integral in
physics,
|
ó
õ |
¥
-¥ |
dx e-x2/(2s2)
= (2p)1/2 s |
|
(c) This is just 3 times the algebra of (a), i.e.
| (¶2/¶x2
+ ¶2 / ¶y2
+ ¶2 / ¶z2
) e-(x2+y2+z2)/(4Dt) = [-3/(2Dt)
+ (x2 + y2 + z2)/(4D2 t2)]e-(x2+y2+z2)/(4Dt) |
|
and
| (¶/¶t)
t-3/2 e-(x2+y2+z2)/(4Dt)
= [-(3/2) t-5/2
+ (x2+y2+z2)/(4Dt7/2)]e-(x2+y2+z2)/(4Dt) |
|
so that
| (¶/ ¶t
- D [¶2
/ ¶x2+ ¶2
/ ¶y2+ ¶2
/ ¶z2] )t-3/2
e-x2/(4Dt) = 0 |
|
(d) The integral of interest,
|
ó
õ |
¥
-¥ |
dx |
ó
õ |
¥
-¥ |
dy |
ó
õ |
¥
-¥ |
dze-(x2+y2+z2)/(4Dt) |
|
is just the cube of the integral of (b), since eA+B = eA
eB, i.e.
| = |
ó
õ |
¥
-¥ |
dx e-x2/(4Dt) |
ó
õ |
¥
-¥ |
dy e-y2/(4Dt) |
ó
õ |
¥
-¥ |
dz e-z2/(4Dt)
= |
é
ë |
|
ó
õ |
¥
-¥ |
dx e-x2/(4Dt) |
ù
û |
3
|
|
|
which by (b) is independent of t.
2. (a) A good way to solve this problem would be to look up the sequence
on Genbank, and immediately find that it is a protein from the E. coli
lambda virus, and that this sequence starts at base position 7202. Referring
to the Genbank map at the start of the file, we find that the protein amino-acid
sequence is
MTKDELIARLRSLGEQLNRDVSLTGTKEELALRVAELKEELDDTDETAGQDTPLSRENVLTGHENE VGSAQPDTVILDTSELVTVVALVKLHTDALHATRDEPVAFVLPGTAFRVSAGVAAEMTERGLARMQ
Note that this is actually only 132 amino acids since the final taa
codon is a STOP signal. It is worth noting that the leading methionine
(M) is always the first amino acid of a protein.
(b) 5'-ctggccggacct-3' (remember that hybridizing strands pair in opposite
directions)
(c) There are of course many possibilities. One is 5'-attggccatt-gcgatatgcg-aatggccaat-3'
3. As discussed in class, all of the solutions are constructed from
the basic law < r2 > = 6 D t
(a) Obviously c = 6D, so that D = c/6
(b) We can write
| < (r1 -
r2)2 > = < (r1 -
r2)·(r1-r2)
> |
|
| = < r12 + r22
+ 2 r1 ·r2 > |
|
Now, we use the linearity of the average, < A + B > = < A > + <
B > to break this into
| = < r12 > + <
r22 > +2 < r1·r2
> = 6 D t + 6 D t + < r1 ·r2
> |
|
The final term is zero, since the Brownian motions of the two particles
are independent of one another - on average they will each independently
average to zero, so their averaged dot product must also be zero.
Thus, ct = 12 Dt giving D = c/12 for each particle.
(c) Actually not so hard. All you do is include the initial displacement,
expand the dot-products as above, and find D = c/12 again.
4. (a) The concentration as a function of height is proportional to
the probability distribution, and must be given by the Boltzmann distribution
where A must be set by requiring that the mean concentration be c0.
The mean concentration is just
| h-1 |
ó
õ |
h
0 |
dz c(z) = A |
kB T
Dmg h |
[1 - e-Delta
mgh/(kB T)] |
|
Since this must be equal to c0, we find that
| A = c0 |
Dm g h /(kB
T)
1 - e-Dmgh/(kB
T) |
|
|
and therefore that the concentration profile is
| c(z) = c0 |
Dm g h /(kB
T)
1 - e-Dm
g h / (kB T) |
e-Dmgz/(kB
T) |
|
(b) For particles which are 20% heavier than water and radius r, we should
use Dm = 4 p r3
×0.2 ×rwater /3.
The factor 4 p ×0.2 ×rwater
/ 3 = 840 kg/m3, so that for the 1 nm and 1 micron particles,
Dm = 8.4×10-25 kg and 8.4×10-16
kg, respectively.
Now consider the combination T/(Dm g) =
5×102 m and 5×10-7 m, respectively.
This is the decay length of the exponential distribution, and therefore
is the height that the particles can be excited up to thermally.
Thus, the 1 nm particles would be suspended up to a height of
500 m, so in the 1 cm tube they will be at essentially constant concentration
with height - this is the size of a small protein, so they are `well suspended'.
By contrast, the 1 micron particles will only be suspended up to a height
of 0.5 microns, i.e. they will be in a very narrow layer at the bottom
of a 1 cm tube.
The figure shows the concentration profile with height for the 1 nm
and 1 micron particles; the 1 nm particles have an almost constant
concentration profile, while the 1 micron particles are all at the bottom
of the tube (I have grossly exaggerated the width of the 1 micron particle
distribution).
I also show the result for 10 nm radius particles (a not-too-large protein)
which is now suspended in equilibrium with a distribution which is a fraction
of the height of the tube. These particles are marginally suspended
in the tube.
File translated from TEX by TTH,
version 2.53.
On 13 Feb 2001, 22:32.