Michael J. Koronkowski, Pharm.D.
Spring 1998

Introduction to Aging: Demographics & Epidemiology, Aging VS. Disease, and its Implication on Drug Therapy and Pharmacy Practice

  1. Global Aging and the Aging of America
  2. Function, Morbidity, and Disability
  3. Analysis of Demographic Change in the USA

Physiology of Aging versus Disease: Implication on Drug Therapy

  1. Aging versus Disease
  2. Physiology and Applied Pharmacology of Aging
  3. Drug-Related Problems
  4. Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR's)

Assigned Readings:

  1. Handout materials.
  2. Nagle BA, Erwin, WG. "Geriatrics" in Pharmacotherapy: A pathophysiologic approach, 3rd edition. eds. DePiro, JT, Talbert, RL, Yee GC, et al. New York Elsevier, 1997, pp. 87-94.

Suggested Readings:

  1. Report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. American Medical Association White Paper on Elderly Health. Arch Intern Med 1990;150:2459-72.

Learning Objectives:

  1. Describe the documented and expected changes in demographic as the relate to aging.
  2. Describe and give examples of disease states that are associated with aging and their implications on health care.
  3. Describe and give examples of disease states that are associated with aging that have implications on pharmacy practice and drug therapy.
  4. In a case scenario recognize the impact of aging and disease on pharmacy practice.
  5. Suggest methods that can be used to overcome age or disease related to sensory impairment as they relate to pharmacy practice.
  6. Discuss the risks for adverse drug reactions, non-compliance and other medication errors as they relate to older patients.
  7. Suggest methods of preventing adverse drug reactions and improve medication taking behavior by older adults.

World Wide Web Resources on Geriatrics

  1. Peters R, Sikorski R. Geriatrics resources on the net: A guide to interactive medicine. JAMA 1997;278(Vol.16):1299-1300.
  2. Glowniak J. The internet as an information source for geriatricians. Drugs & Aging 1997;10(3):169-173.

Message to Students:

Aging is an universal process to humans. At present it is an international phenomenon that is occurring across the globe including the third world. Aging has economic, ethical, lifestyle, political and health care implications to society (to name a few) which over the course of the next century will perhaps dictate society's planning and use of resources more than any other single variable.

It is the intent of this series of lectures to provide a introduction to geriatrics and gerontology. Some of you may already have a strong background in these fields, while for others the material may be new. In any case, aging will most certainly impact you professionally and personally. After all, EVERYONE IS DOING IT!

I. Global Aging and the Aging of America

In 1900, » 4% of the U.S. population was ³ 65 years old. Today, » 13% of the population is ³ 65 and midway through the next century 20 to 25% of the population will be ³ 65 years. This change in demographics is not unique to the U.S. Countries such as Sweden have already exceeded the 20% mark.

The fastest growing segment of the U.S. population are the old-old or persons ³ 85 years. This segment increased from 0.1% of the population in 1900 to 1% in 1980. Between 1960 and 1980, this portion of the population increased 126% compared to a 26% increase for the rest of the population. Estimates for the year 2050 predict that 5.0% of the population will be ³ 85 years of age.

Drug use patterns have also been affected by the changing demographics. In 1968, 10% of the U.S. population was ³ 65 and purchased 25% of all prescription drugs, by 1981 these figures were 12% and 31%, respectively. By the year 2040 it is predicted that 50% of prescription drugs will be purchased by the 20-25% of the population ³ 65.

B. Why the increase in the elderly population?

1. Decrease in fertility rate

This affects the percent of the population ³ 65, not the total number.

2. Reduction in mortality

The age-related mortality rates in the U.S. have been decreasing since 1904 when only 25% of the population lived beyond age 65, compared to 70% in 1985.

Why the decrease in mortality?

Many would claim that treating hypertension, Medicare and health insurance, less people smoking, exercise, and a healthier diet are responsible for the decrease in mortality. In fact, the major impact of these interventions have yet to be realized. The real reason for the decline in mortality are improvements in overall living conditions and sanitation.

Over the past 150 years, the major causes of mortality have switched from infectious to chronic disease. For example, tuberculosis was the number one cause of death in the U. S. in 1900, but its incidence had been decreasing since 1856 [Note: tuberculosis is currently on the rise secondary to immigration patterns and immunodeficiency viruses]. In 1984, the four leading causes of death in the U.S. were cardiovascular, cancer, strokes, and pulmonary disease (COPD). Pneumonia and influenza ranked #5 and septicemia ranks #l0.

3. Increase in real numbers and percent primarily due to an increase in the number of annual births before 1920 and after World War II [Baby Boom].

4. Increased life expectancy after age 65

a. Life expectancy - the average number years of life from birth (life span) or some other stated age.

Between 1900 and 1940 the overall life expectancy increase by 14 years, but for those ³ 65 the increase was < 1 year. However, since 1950 the percent gain in life expectancy has favored those ³ 65.

Country Year 0 1 65
Suriname 1985 63.6 64.8 13.6
USSR 1990 64.2 64.8 12.4
Hungary 1990 65.1 65.2 12.1
USA 1988 71.6 71.4 15.0
UK 1990 73.0 72.6 14.2
Japan 1989 76.2 75.5 16.5

SOURCE: WHO Health Statistics Annual, 1991

b. Has the gain in life expectancy been accompanied by a gain in health status?

This is where the question of quality of life becomes an issue. Katz et al. used a longitudinal study of older persons in Massachusetts to address this question. He calculated a persons active life expectancy (the expected number of years remaining in which the person remains independent in function, i.e., disability free). Katz found that since 1950 only 1.3 of the 4.5 years gained in life expectancy by men was disability free and for women only 1.4 out of 7.5 years gained in life expectancy was disability free. Katz concluded that although women consistently lived longer than men, the number of years spent disabled is greater and the total non-disabled life expectancy for men and women ³ 65 are similar. (Katz S, et al. NEJM 1983;309:1218-24)

This finding significantly shaped the current philosophy of geriatrics and gerontology so that emphasis is placed on disease prevention and the compression of morbidity in order to increase active life expectancy.

II. Function, Morbidity, and Disability

A. Measures of Functional Status

1. Activities of Daily Living (ADL’s)

feeding, dressing, ambulating

toileting, continence, bathing

grooming, transfer, communication

2. Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL’s)

writing, reading, cooking

cleaning, shopping, laundry

climb stairs, use telephone, manage medications

manage money, ability to travel, ability to work

B. Morbidity - Chronic Diseases and Co-morbidities

1. Common chronic conditions and co-morbidities

NUMBER OF SELECTED REPORTED CHRONIC CONDITIONS/1000 PERSONS IN THE USA BY AGE,1982

Types of Conditions Total 65 + yr 65 - 74 yr >= 75 yr
Arithritis 495.8 507.8 476.0
Hypertension 390.4 384.3 400.4
Hearing impairment 299.7 262.0 362.2
Heart disease 256.8 224.7 310.0
Deformity or orthopedic impairment 168.5 172.7 161.5
Chronic sinusitis 151.7 159.1 139.6
Visual impairment 101.1 80.7 134.8
Diabetes 88.9 96.6 76.3
Varicose veins 77.7 79.3 75.2
Hernia of abdominal cavity 75.5 87.8 55.2

(Adapted from J. A. Brody, D. B. Brock and T. F. Williams: "Trends in the health of elderly population", in Annual Review of Public Health, Vol. 8, pp. 211-234. 1987. Used with permission)

C. Examples of projected increase in disabilities

Projected Number of:

Year Hip fractures/yr Persons with dementia
1980 200,000 2 million
2000 350,000 3.7 million
2050 650,000 8.5 million

III. Analysis of Demographic Change in the USA

A. Effect of Gender

Currently, women outnumber men in those over 65 years by 3 to 2. Because women live longer and because of the way pensions are generally administered, women living alone tend to be the poorest among the elderly.

B. Effect of Race

The squaring of the population pyramid is more true of whites than of Blacks. Premature black deaths are caused by both a lower mean life span and by greater mortality among the young. Whereas, in 1989, the proportion of Whites over 65 was 13%, the proportion of Blacks and Hispanics was only 8% and 5% respectively.

C. Effect of Fertility

The current rate of increase in the elderly population in the USA largely reflects variations in the birth rate (with a delay of 65 years). Low birth rates during the depression and World War I, together with wartime loss of many young adults, is reflected in the very modest rise in the elderly population projected between now and 2010. This should be followed by a very rapid rise , as the baby boomers age. A different picture of increase emerges with the very old (85+), where an exponential increase began about 1950, and the numbers will grow rapidly through 2050.

D. Geographic Location and Residence

Populations of individual states are governed by 3 factors as any population: fertility, mortality, and migration. Of these the most powerful here is migration. Thus, Florida, in 1989, had an elderly population of 18%, whereas Alaska had one of 4.1%. Curiously, many elderly retire to such places as Florida, many subsequently return to their home states when they become very elderly, probably to gain the support of friends and family.

E. Support Ratios

A useful concept is the support ratio, which is the number of persons in a dependency situation (i.e. those over 65 years or those 0-19 years) per 100 persons in a supportive role (those aged between 20-64). This is therefore some measure of societal burden imposed by an elderly population. In terms of the elderly, the ratio has been rising throughout the century (7:100 in 1900, a projected 29:100 in 2020, and 40:100 in 2050)

F. Individual Finances

The elderly, as a group, are a relatively poor segment of the population. If we disregard potential income from home equity about 45% of those over 70, in 1988 had a cash income of between $0 and $10,000. Less than 10% had an income of $35,000 or more. Yet medical expenses are much higher than in any other group.

We are approaching an era with a very different age distribution from the present time. Usually, this fact is equated with enormously increased requirements for health care costs and services--but this assumes that society (those with political and financial power) will accept such a burden. at the very least, some extremely hard choices involving limitation of care will be required. More preventative medicine, more efficient and cost-saving curative medicine, and better accountability of cost benefit will be necessary in order to avoid increasing confrontation between a rapidly growing dependent sector of society (ELDERLY) and an increasingly burdened working sector.

Physiology of Aging versus Disease: Implications on Drug Therapy

I. Aging versus Disease

  1. Disease is abnormal; aging is normal

1.Aging is heterogeneous

2.Aging is universal

3. Aging and chronic disease are independent

  1. Four out of five persons ³ 65 has at least one chronic condition

4. Changes which accompany aging also can lead to morbid or fatal events

Example:

- Impaired Glucose Tolerance (40% of the elderly have altered carbohydrate tolerance0

  1. changes in glucose tolerance with aging

1. after age 30-40, there is a 1 to 2mg/dl increase in fasting glucose levels/decade

2. after age 30-40, the 2 hour post-prandial plasma glucose increases by 8-20mg/dl, per decade

II. Physiology and Applied Pharmacology of Aging

  1. Organ - Systems and Potential Impact on Drug Response

  1. Physiologic Age-Related Changes and their Impact on Drug Response

1. changes in height

  1. height loss is inevitable with advancing age
  2. onset and rate greatly variable (» 2 inches by 80 years of age)
  3. spinal compression, joint space narrowing, and flatten arches may contribute

2. changes in weight

  1. exercise and eating habits impact rather than aging process

3. changes in body composition

  1. fat proportion doubles between 25 and 75 years of age
  2. loss of lean body mass, with some decrease in bone and body organ mass
  3. less water volume
  4. the above results in major drug distribution and disposition changes

4. changes in renal function

  1. with aging, there is » 25-30% decrease in kidney mass
  2. renal blood flow decreases significantly with age
  3. creatinine clearance declines on average 8ml/min/1.73m2/decade
  4. creatinine clearance is often overestimated

5. changes in hepatic metabolism

  1. decreased liver mass by 1/3 with advancing age can lead to ¯ intrinsic metabolism
  2. pre-synaptic metabolism of some drugs (propranolol, verapamil) declines in older people
  3. drugs metabolized by one-step conjugation preferred over drugs requiring multi-step metabolism (i.e. lorazepam or oxazepam preferred over diazepam or chlordiazepoxide as benzodiazepines)

  1. Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Age-Related Changes and their Impact on Drug Response

Pharmacokinetic- factors affecting drug concentrations at the site of action over defined periods of time.

Pharmacodynamics- end organ responsiveness to a given drug concentration (i.e. "change in function of an end organ (site of action) that results from drug---end organ interaction

1. General Principles, pharmacodynamic changes are less well defined

  1. dependent upon pharmacokinetic parameters
  2. alteration in receptor site(s), and/or receptor integrity - (¯ responsiveness of beta-adrenergic receptors with age)
  3. neurotransmission - (¯ number of functioning neurons and neurotransmitters or an increase in synaptic gap may attenuate drug-end organ response)
  4. idiosyncratic - unpredictable drug-end organ response
  5. responsiveness - elderly shown more "sensitive" to lower concentrations of some agents (both benzodiazepines and warfarin)
  1. Sensory changes (i.e. vision, hearing, taste, and touch) and Disease which Impact on Pharmacy Practice

1. The Older Eye and Vision

  1. decreased accommodation
  2. decreased visual acuity
  3. decreased adaptation to darkness
  4. decreased peripheral vision
  5. decreased glare tolerance
  6. decreased contrast sensitivity
  7. decreased tear secretion

Specific Problems

1. patients complain of foreign body sensation, a gritty felling or dryness

2. Treatment

  1. increase the humidity in the environment
  2. eliminate drugs which may decrease tear production
  3. artificial tear products

1. leading cause of legal blindness in the elderly

2. no treatment at the present time

Evaluation Tips:

  1. make sure corrective lenses (glasses/contacts) are clean and fit properly
  2. make sure that corrective lenses are the patient’s
  3. make sure lighting is adequate

Low Vision Aids:

  1. increased wattage of light bulb
  2. tinted glasses may decrease glare
  3. magnification devices
  4. night lights
  5. large print on prescription labels, books, etc.

2. The Older Ear and Hearing Loss (» 7-20 million Americans have some hearing impairment; 50% of persons ³ 65)

Specific Problems:

Presbycusis- bilateral symmetric, sensorineural hearing loss that is associated with aging

  1. secondary to aging
  2. usually high frequency tone is lost first
  3. prolonged noise exposure, decreased blood flow, and athlerosclerosis may contribute

Interviewing a hearing-impaired elder

  1. move to a quiet place
  2. sit them in a corner at eye level
  3. lower the tone of your voice
  4. make sure the area is well lighted
  5. speak slowly and clearly
  6. avoid shouting, it conveys anger and hostility
  7. stay still
  8. use nonverbal gestures
  9. reinforce meaning through touch

3. Age related changes in Taste and Smell

  1. dysgeusia- an unpleasant taste in the mouth
  2. dysosmia- an unpleasant smell
  1. age related losses begin in the sixth decade and progress gradually
  2. most commonly due to neural degeneration and atrophy
  3. » incidence of hypogeusia and hyposmia in the elderly is 40%
  4. may lead to nutritional deficiencies and impaired detection of hazards

4. Age related changes in Touch

  1. response to painful stimuli is diminished with aging
  2. pressure touch thresholds on fingers and toes diminish
  1. Compliance and its Impact on Drug Response

1. Intentional versus Nonintentional Noncompliance (Cooper, et al. J Am Geriatr Soc 1982;30:329-33.)

Intentional (90%) Unintentional (10%)
52% Do not need 60% to expensive
15% adverse effects 15% forgot to take
4% need more 2% misunderstood
  1. more likely to use ³ 2 prescription medications
  2. more likely to have medications prescribed by ³ 2 prescribers
  3. compliance aids were useful primarily when patients had difficulty remembering to take medication

2. Dangers of Noncompliance

"syndrome of relocation stress"- movement of an individual into a controlled health care environment such as admission to a nursing care facility or an acute care setting results in 100% compliance with medication which may result in occult drug toxicity.

3. Hoarding and Sharing of Medications

4. Ways to improve medication compliance

  1. minimizing the number of medicines
  2. simplify medication regimens - chronic medications dosed at most twice daily
  3. increase the user’s knowledge- clear, simple repeated explanation of medication usage
  4. compliance aids- large legible labels, easy-to-remove vial tops, weekly pill boxes, etc.
  5. develop a standard system of promoting compliance
Increase compliance Patient's belief that disease is serious
  Good communication by physician about purpose of medicine
  Drug calendars and reminder cards
  Blister-pack packaging of drugs
  Multicompartment pill boxes
  Compliance counseling
Decrease compliance Multiple drug therapy
  Complicated drug regimen
  Long duration of therapy
  Patient's concern that drug will cause toxicity
  Patient's belief that drug is unnecessary
  Cognitive impairment
  Child-proof pill containers
Do not affect compliance Age
  Patient's sex
  Ethnicity
  Educational level
  Severity of disease
  Efficacy or toxicity
  Drug costs(?)

III. Drug-Related Problems

  1. Multiple Medication Use- Polypharmacy
  1. the use of multiple prescription and OTC medication (Healthy People 200, 1990.)
  2. the prescription, administration, or use of more medications than are clinically indicated
  3. when a medical drug regimen contains at least one unnecessary medication
  4. the concomitant use of ³ 5 medications

Typical reasons for polypharmacy

  1. multiple prescribers
  2. prescribing practices
  3. multiple pharmacies
  4. lack of a regular, comprehensive medication review
  5. patients’ belief that they need a pill for every illness
  6. lack of patient education by a health care provider or lack of patient knowledge
  7. health care practitioner education ineffective

Methods for preventing polypharmacy

  1. patient education - patient tailored
  2. educate physician, pharmacist, and other health care providers
  3. improve physician prescribing - through both regulatory and non-regulatory means
  1. Medication Errors (Schwartz et al. Am J Pub Health 1962;52:2015-29.)
  1. Practical Solutions and Guidelines to Prevent Drug Related Problems (adapted from Stewart RB and Cooper JW. Drugs and Aging 1994;4:449-56.)

Prescribing Guidelines to follow

  1. Is the drug necessary?
  2. Assess the benefit to risk ratio
  3. Attempt to make an accurate diagnosis before treatment
  4. Consider and implement all nondrug alternative
  5. Use caution when prescribing for a person who indicates that all previous drugs have failed
  6. Take a comprehensive medication history
  7. Educate and inform patient’s regarding their drug therapy
  8. Communicate with other prescribers and health providers
  9. Avoid treating adverse drug effects with concomitant medication
  10. Try to prescribe a drug that will treat more than one condition
  11. Avoid combination products
  12. Screen for drug-drug and drug-disease interactions
  13. Keep the medication regimen simple
  14. Limit the use of PRN medications
  15. Consider all new medications as a therapeutic trial, re-evaluate therapy continuously

Monitoring Guidelines to follow

  1. Assess if the drug is producing a therapeutic goal
  2. Determine if the drug is still needed, do not be afraid to stop medication with no or unclear indications
  3. Determine if the drug is producing any adverse effects
  4. Assess patients’ complaints or symptoms
  5. Conduct a drug regimen review at least annually

Rules For Dispensing Medication (Morrow D, Lierer V, Sheikh J. Adherence and Medication Instructions: Review and recommendations, J Am Geriatr Soc 1988;36:1147-60.)

Rule 1: Medication instructions should contain 13 basic components:

  1. Patient’s name
  2. Physician name and phone number
  3. Medication name (both Brand dispensed and chemical name0
  4. Indication
  5. How the medication works
  6. Interaction warnings
  7. Dosage form
  8. Dose
  9. Frequency and times
  10. Duration and refill
  11. Date of issue and expiration date
  12. common adverse effects
  13. Emergency numbers

Rule 2: Medication instructions should be in list format

Rule 3: Begin with the title stating the patient specific goal of the therapy

Rule 4: Use familiar terminology the patient understands

Rule 5: Instruction should be at least 14 point font size or larger

Rule 6: Describe directions with explicit words and phrases

Rule 7: Avoid using ambiguous words and phrases

IV. Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR’s)

  1. Factors Predisposing in the Elderly to ADR’s
  1. multiple medication use
  2. multiple effects of drugs
  3. physiological changes in drug disposition (due to age and disease)
  4. misuse of medication

Methods of Preventing/Minimizing Adverse Drug Reactions

Limit the number of drugs taken (before a drug is prescribed, ask yourself the following:)

  1. Is this the most effective drug for the disease or condition being treated?
  2. Is the dose appropriate given the patient’s age, renal, and hepatic function?
  3. Is the patient allergic to the drug or similar chemical
  4. Is the patient already taking a drug with pharmacological properties that would duplicate or antagonize the new agent/
  5. Will the addition of the new agent increase the complexity of the patient’s medication regimen such that compliance will be compromised?
  6. Does the patient have another disease that would contradict the use of the drug?
  7. Does the patient understand why the drug is being prescribed and how to take the medicine?
  8. Is the indication for the new drug actually a reaction or secondary to a currently prescribed medication?

Concerning medication already in the patient’s regimen, consider the following questions:

  1. Is the drug still needed?
  2. Is the patient still responding to the regimen?
  3. Is the patient using the drug appropriately with regard to dosing or administration?
  4. Is there a relationship between drugs in the patients regimen and signs or symptoms observed?
  1. Impact of Adverse Drug Reactions on Quality of Life and Functional Decline
  1. Activities of Daily Living (ADL’s)
  2. Cognitive impairment
  1. Drug Interactions
  1. Drug-disease interactions:
  1. increased prevalence of disease in the older person
  2. difficulty distinguishing subtle reactions from the effects of disease (confounding)
  1. Drug-drug interactions:
  1. pharmacokinetic interactions causing differences in drug disposition
  2. pharmacodynamic interactions causing differences in drug effect
  1. Considerations for effective pharmacotherapy - Effects of specific drug classes
  1. Diuretics
  1. Antihypertensive drugs
  1. Antiarrhyhtmic drugs
  1. Antiparkinsonian drugs
  1. Psychoactive drugs
  1. Anticoagulants
  1. Hypoglycemic drugs
  1. Analgesics

Selected References

  1. Brody EM, Kleban MH, Moles E. What older people do about their day-to-day mental and physical health symptoms. J Am Geriatric Soc 1983;31:489-98.
  2. Brody JA. Prospects for an aging population. Nature 1985;315:463-6.
  3. Burns E, Austin CA, Bax NDS. elderly patients’ understanding of their drug therapy: the effect of cognitive function. Age and Aging 1990;19:236-40.
  4. Campbell AJ. Drug treatment as a cause of falls in old age: A review of the offending agents. Drugs & Aging 1991;1:289-302.
  5. Fedder DO. Managing medication and compliance: Physician-Pharmacist-Patient Interactions. J Am Geriatric Soc 1982;30:S113-7.
  6. Fies JF. Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity. NEJM 1980;303:130-5.
  7. Fries S, Branch LG, Branson MH, et al. Active life expectancy NEJM 1983,309:1218-24.
  8. Gryfe CI, Gryfe BM. Drug therapy of the aged: The problems of compliance and the roles of physicians and pharmacists. J AM Geriatric Soc 1984;32:301-7.
  9. Guralnik JM, FitzSimmons SC. Aging in America: A demographic perspective Cardiology Clinics 1986;4:175-83.
  10. Johnston M, Clarke A, Mundy K, et al. Facilitating comprehension of discharge medication in elderly patients. Age and Aging 1986;15:304-6.
  11. Klein LE, German PS, Levine DM, et al. Medication problems among outpatients: A study with emphasis on the elderly. Arch Intern Med 1984;144:1185-8.
  12. Meyer ME, Schuna AA. Assessment of geriatric patients’ functional ability to take medication. DICP 1989;23:171-4.
  13. National Center for Health Statistics, RJ Havlik, BM Liu, Kovar, et al. Health Statistics on older Persons, United States, 1986. Vital & Health Statistics. Series 3, No.25. DHHS Pub.No. (PHS) 87-1409. Public Health Service. Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office, June, 1987.
  14. Olshansky SJ, Carnes BA, Cassel C. In search of Methuselah: stimating the upper limits to human longevity. Science 1990;250:634-40.
  15. Schneider EL, Guralnik M. The aging of America: Impact on health care costs. JAMA 1990;263:2335-40.
  16. Strand LM, Morley PC, Cipolle RJ, et al. Drug-related problems: Their structure and function. DICP Ann Pharmacother 1990;24:1903-7.
  17. Zuccolo G, Liddell H. The elderly and the medication label: doing it better. Age and Aging 1985;14:371-6.

Previous Next Syllabus
The College of Pharmacy UICPHARM@uic.edu
The University of Illinois at Chicago Last modified: Jan 6, 1998