PSCH 352, Summer 2005
Notes, 6/16
First: Finish LTM
notes from 6/15 about losing information from memory
Where can forgetting
happen?
1. encoding –
2. storage –
3. retrieval –
availability vs.
accessibility
example of retrieval
failure –
tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) effects –
Extreme
forgetting – amnesia
loss of memory or memory abilities caused by
brain damage
or disease
two types
1. retrograde amnesia – loss of memory
for events that happened before damage
2. anterograde amnesia – loss of memory
for events that happened after damage (ie, the inability to form new
memories)
Retrograde and anterograde amnesia illustrate the
idea of a double dissociation – two components of
the memory system in which when one is disturbed, the other is not. For example, HM cannot form new
memories,
but he can remember events from before his surgery.
KC
–
retrograde
amnesia. KC was in a motorcycle
accident and received severe damage to his frontal lobes.
He cannot remember anything that happened to
him before the accident. He also has
some anterograde amnesia,
in that he does not have episodic memories
for after
the accident. However, he can form new
semantic memories,
and new procedural memories. His
semantic memory for prior to the accident is also
intact. For example, KC
remembers facts
that he learned in school (semantic memory) and can learn new facts. He also remembers old
procedural memories,
like playing chess, and can learn form new procedural memories. KC
shows how episodic
and semantic memory are double dissociated.
HM – anterograde
amnesia. HM’s hippocampus (in both
hemispheres) was surgically lesioned in 1953 as an
attempt to control
his
epileptic seizures. The hippocampus is
involved in the formation of new memories, and as
a result HM was
unable to
form any new memories, episodic, semantic, or procedural.
In short, he could not form
any new explicit
memories. However, HM did show implicit
learning. He was taught to do 2 tasks –
mirror-tracing,
and the Tower of Hanoi.
Although HM had no explicit memory for how to do these tasks, he
took
less and less
trials over several days to learn them.
In this way, HM showed implicit learning for the tasks. HM
shows how
explicit and implicit memory are double dissociated.
How
do
we study
implicit memory?
Discussion of HM and KC articles