other estimates:
-
between 40% and 75% of women in shelters
report co-occurrence of child abuse
-
they probably under-report their own abusive
behavior
-
two of every three abused children are parented
by battered women
-
most child protection agencies are completely
unaware or unconcerned about this fact
-
two primary definitions of the problem (from
Peled)
-
pathology
v. empowerment (same conflict we saw in . . .
-
O'Leary v. Yllo (on the causes of domestic
violence)
-
Walker v. Bowker (on battered women's syndrome)
-
medical
model:
children who witness violence have a syndrome (a la PTSD) requiring therapy
-
focus on damage done by violence rather than
coping skills
-
views children as passive and helpless
-
focus directed at inadequate parenting
-
may suggest mother and man share responsibility
for the childs condition, usually re-victimizing the mother
-
social
structural (feminist) model:
while the child may be
harmed by observing violence, the focus must be on the social mechanisms
which foster the violence and on building the child's coping skills
-
immediate individual intervention with child
and parents
-
a focus on gender roles, values, power, and
violence
-
more ecological but also controversial politics
which can alienate helpers & outsiders
-
IMHO, much of the current literature and
practice in this area:
-
focuses on the negative effects children
experience as a result of witnessing violence--pathologizes children and
mothers while ignoring batterers
-
ignores the concern that most abused women
have for their children
-
ignores the fact that most mothers of children
who witness DV are actively taking action to protect their children
-
even when it appears to caseworkers, cops,
and judges that they are not
-
even when they stay with the abuser
-
blames battered women for the child's witnessing
DV
-
80% of US jursdiction include "mental &
emotional injury" as a reportable condition under child protection laws
=>
-
observation of DV can be considered a form
of child malteatment by professionals who do not understand the nature
of domestic violence
-
laws are child behavior-oriented rather than
parent behavior-oriented, requiring evidence of damage to the child
Grusinski, Brink, & Edleson
The DAP Childrens Program: FORM, CONTENT,
DOSE & CONTEXT
-
Program Form:
type of communication used
-
child group followed by family group
-
providing information (initial)
-
activities designed to promote self disclosure
(later)
-
activities per se
-
Program Content:
what the client learns
-
I'm not responsible
-
Shame & Isolation: labeling the feelings
-
expressing feelings
-
protection planning
-
how to resolve conflicts
-
I'm an important person (self esteem)
-
gender roles: boys and girls, men and women
-
Program
Dose: how program delivered
-
1 and 1.5 hour groups per week (younger &
older kids)
-
family group follows chld group (perp inclusion
depends on victim safety)
-
10 weeks
-
Program Context:
where the intervention occurs in the case
-
each group begins with an activity, breaks
in the middle, and ends with check-out or evaluation activity
-
week 1-3 are educational; program content
begins in earnest n 4th group
Jeff
Edleson (1999)
Childrens
witnessing (CW) of adult domestic violence
-
most
common form of CW is using kids in divorce conflict and as spies
-
putting
pressure on the mother to take dad back
-
3-10
million annual CW incidence estimate from Carlson (1984) and Straus (1992)
-
Best
single figure: 1 in 3 children are CW
-
78%
of children whose parents say the kids do not know about DV report hearing
& knowing about DV (O'Brien et al, 1994)
-
Critique
of research
-
many
researchers do not differentiate kids who are CW from kids who are abused
-
most
studies use kids in shelter samples
-
no national
sample
-
Problems
associated with CW
-
more
aggression
-
less
social competence
-
more
likely to be violent
-
boy
CWs more likely to approve of violence
-
long
term problem duration
-
no support
for H that CW more likely to be criminal as adult
-
child
victim and CW are additive in effect
-
CW effects
are different than abuse effects
-
in general
(Spaccarelli, et al, 1994 disagree) boy CW more externalizing, girl CW
more internalizing
-
no effects
by race & ethnicity
-
time
reduces effects
-
M-child
relationships moderates effect
Sandra
Graham-Berman (2002)
Child
abuse (CA) in the context of domestic violence
-
CA mandated
report, not CW
-
states
document CA but don't document DV
-
difficult
to separate the abuse of a child from the abuse of childs mother
-
In a
study of 119 children of abused women, 12% of the children and 70% of the
mothers were injured during mothers last DV victimization
-
overlap
of DV & CA: 6% in population, 20% to 100% in clinical samples