SECTION II RADIATION
GENETICS
A. SUMMARY OF SOME BASIC CONCEPTS IN RADIATION GENETICS:
- Major problems and questions in Radiation Genetics
- Is there a threshold dose?
- What is the shape of the close-response curve?
- How reliable is extrapolation of human risk from experimental animal
data?
- Can genetic damage be repaired?
- Problems in Radiation Genetics
- no unique mutations
- most mutations are recessive
- rare event
- within the same species, genes vary both in their spontaneous mutation
rate and in their vulnerability to radiation
- Doubling-Dose for Mutations in Male Mice (Low LET radiations)
- Acute (High Dose-Rate): 200-300 mGy (20-30 rads)
- Protracted (Low Dose-Rate): 0.9-1 Gy (90-100 rads)
- Estimated Mutagenic Hazard in Humans
2-3x10-7 genetic generations of 30 yrs each = 300 years
- B Cell: a cell with one or more chromosomes with staining gaps
- C Cell: A cell containing one or more structurally abnormal chromosomes.
Chromosome aberrations are subdivided in -stable (Cs), i.e. survivable,
and unstable (Cu), i.e. fatal to the daughter cells inheriting them
- Linear Quadratic (L-Q) Model of Response: the model which states
that biological effects of radiation are partly proportional to the first
power of the Dose (the linear term) and partly proportional to the square
of the Dose (the quadratic term), with A and B representing the linear
and quadratic probability coefficients, respectively. Thus the yield of
chromosome aberrations (Y) after dose (D), when plotted on log-log coordinates
is:
Y = AD+BD2
- Genetic Maximum Permissible Dose Limits
- Occupational: 50 mSv (5 rem) per year
- General population: 1.7 mSv (170 mrem) per year
B. RADIATION EFFECTS ON DNA:
Effects
on DNA
Four
Kinds of Radiation Induced DNA Damage.
- Chain breaks: Single or double, are caused by ionization. Single
strand break in DNA following irradiation can lead to rejoin or, in the
presence of O2, to a peroxidized end which cannot rejoin.
Typically Low L.E.T. Radiation

Double chain break in DNA. For separation of fragments.
Typically High L.E.T. Radiation

- Cross-linking between strands, between adjacent DNA molecules,
and between DNA and proteins. Caused by UV, x-rays, chemicals.

Crosslinking between two irradiated molecules. For diagrammatic
purposes, the relative position of the two strands is shifted in the third
illustration.
- Base damage: caused by UV light, carcinogens.
- Dimerization: within one strand or between strands dimers may
be formed:

During DNA replication, a dimer is not recognized, replication stops.
This means loss of information.
- Classification of Chromosomal Anomalies and Effect at Anaphase

Some chromosome aberrations.

- Repair: Chain breaks --> polynucleotide ligase; base damage:
"cut and snip" enzyme complex.

- G-Value (Chemical Yield)
- G = # molecules changed/100 eV
- Examples for Dan (in vitro)
| Effect |
G
Value |
| Sugar
phosphate rupture |
2.0 |
| Double
strand breaks |
0.12 |
| Single
strand breaks |
2-10 |
| H-bond
breakage |
50-60 |
| Release
of inorganic phosphate |
.09 |
| Release
of ammonia |
.47 |
|
|
| Ionization
Air Avg |
33.7
eV/1p |
| Molecular
Avg: |
10-25
eV/ip |
| Excitation |
=
7-23 eV/1p |
C. SOME SUMMARY
POINTS TO KNOWN:
- Many single-stranded breaks
are produced in DNA by radiation but are readily repaired using the opposite
DNA strand as a template (role of endonuclease).
- Breaks in both strands,
if well separated, are also readily repaired since they are handled individually.
- Breaks in both strands
that are opposite, or separated by only a few base pairs, may lead to a
double-strand break (which cannot be easily repaired).
- Energy from x-ray is deposited
unevenly in "spurs" and "blobs." This may lead to multiple
damaged sites, that is, a combination of double-stranded and base damage.
- Radiation-induced breakage
and incorrect rejoining in pre-replication chromosomes (G1 phase) may lead
to chromosome aberrations.
- Radiation-induced breakage
and incorrect rejoining in post-replication chromosome (S and G2 phase)
may lead to chromotid aberrations.
- Principal aberrations
include dicentrics, rings, acentric fragments, and anaphase bridges.
- The incidence of
most radiation-induced aberrations is a linear-quadratic function of dose.
- Scoring aberrations in
lymphocytes from peripheral blood may be used to estimate total-body doses
in humans accidentally irradiated. The lowest single dose that can be detected
readily is 250 mGy (25 rads).
- Aberrations can still
be detected in irradiated persons up to 40 years after exposure.
- There is a good correlation
between cells killed and cells with an asymmetrical exchange aberration
(i.e., a dicentric or ring formation).
SOME IMPORTANT
RELATIONSHIPS IN RADIATION GENETICS



D. Genetic Effects
- Overview
- No evidence of effects
in humans
- however, this does not
mean there are no effects
- high background of effects
- recessive mutations may
take many generations to express themselves with a significant frequency
- Insect Data (Fruit
Fly)
- 1927 H.J. Muller. Work
with Drosophila
- irradiation prior to procreation
+ measured frequency of lethal mutation in progeny
- dose response: linear
non-threshold

- no dose rate or
fractionation effects were observed.
- proposed: single-hit model
- NCRP adopted the experimental
evidence in its recommendation to lower the MPD to 5 rem/yr (1932).
- Animal Data (Mega-mouse
Study)
- Russell & Russell
(1945) Mouse Colony
- 7 x 106 mice
@ 0.001 -103 rads/mouse
- observed 7 specific genes
for easily identifiable characteristics (ear shape, coat color, eye color,
etc.)
- demonstrated:
- dose rate effect (indicates
repair)
- males more sensitive than
females
- linear non-threshold fit
to data no "unusual" mutations
- mutation rate = 15x's
fruit fly results
- Doubling Dose (Results
of the RUSSELL Experiments)
- doubling dose: That dose
of radiation which will produce twice the frequency of genetic mutations
as would have been observed without the radiation.
- estimated doubling dose
- mouse: 200 mGy – 2 Gy
(20-200 rads)
- human: 330 mGy (33 rads)
- Genetically Significant
Dose (GSD)
- GSD: The gonadal
dose which, if received by every member of the population, would be expected
to produce the total genetic effect on the population as the sum of the
individual doses actually received.
- mathematical formalism
- GSD =

where:
D = average gonadal dose
per examination
N= # of people irradiated
N = total # of people in
the population
P = expected future # of
children per person
HUMAN STUDIES
- estimated GSD from diagnostic
x-rays
| Population |
Time of study
|
GSD (mrad)
|
| Australia |
1950- 1955
|
159
|
| Sweden |
1955
|
72
|
| Denmark |
1956
|
22
|
| Great
Britain |
1957-1958
|
14
|
| Japan |
1960
|
39
|
| New
Zealand |
1963
|
12
|
| United
States |
1964
|
16
|
| United
States |
1970
|
20
|
- radiation mutations are
usually harmful
- any dose carries with
it some genetic risk (i.e.: non threshold)
- frequency, mutation a
dose (i.e. linear hypothesis)
- effects are dependent
an
- dose rate
- fractionation
- Therefore repair processes
exist
- males more sensitive than
female
- most mutations are recessive,
therefore may take many generations to express
- radiation induced frequency
is very low:
- spontaneous incidence
is very high
- Other Effects
- Cataracts (Non-Stochastic
Effect)
- First Effect seen (1949:
Cyclotron physicist)
- Radiosensitivity of the
lens of the eye is:
- Age dependent. As age
--> latent period ¯
- Range: 5-30 years. Average:
15 years
- Charged particles (e.g.
protons) are more effective than photons
- Dose response relationship:
threshold, nonlinear
- < 2 Gy (200 rads) =
threshold
- 10 Gy (1000 rads) = 100%
cataracts
- Life Span Shortening
- Many experiments
with animals have demonstrated
- chronically irradiated
animals die young
- close response is linear
-- non-threshold

This is a typical
result with mice
- Epidemiologic
Study: Three Physician Groups
- RSNA: Radiological Society
of North America
- ACP: American College
of Physicians
- AAOO: American Academy
of Ophthalmology
|
|
Median age at death
|
Age-adjusted
Deaths per 1000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.4
|
18.4
|
|
|
73.4
|
15.4
|
|
|
76.2
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72.0
|
16.4
|
|
|
74.8
|
13.7
|
|
|
76.0
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.5
|
13.6
|
|
|
76.0
|
11.4
|
|
|
76.4
|
10.6
|
- Epidemiologic Study (comparison
between American Radiologist & US Population)

- Note:
- similar studies
in other countries (e.g. Great Britain) have failed to confirm any positive
effect.
- any effects observed in
"early radiologist" have disappeared, presumably related to better
health physics practices and better equipment.
SUMMARY
OF GENETIC EFFECTS AND CARDINOGENESIS
Genetic Effects:
To date, there is no data
that proves that radiation can cause inherited genetic damage in any irradiated
human population. There is no significant increase in any indicator of
inherited (genetic) damage in any irradiated human population.
Our knowledge of the genetic
effects of radiation therefore comes entirely from laboratory studies with
animals, plants, and cell cultures. Risk estimates for man rely heavily
on animal data (especially data from the mouse). Best human data available
= follow-up of children born to survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Major
findings from these data are summarized from Bier V.
- Pregnancy termination
studies--Study of 75,000 births (38,000 of which had at least 1 exposed
parent). No significant effect of radiation on still births,
birth rate, congenital abnormalities, infant mortality, childhood mortality,
leukemia, or sex ratio.
- Study of all live-born children born in Hiroshima and Nagasaki between
may 1946 and December 1958 No statistically significant effects noted to
date.
- Cytogenetic study of children born to exposed parents show no significant
effect demonstrated.
- BLOOD PROTEIN STUDIES:
Studies of rare electrophoretic varients of 28 proteins of
blood plasma and erythrocytes, of deficiency variants of 10 erythrocyte
enzymes, of children of exposed parents: 667,404 tests - 3 probable mutations,
and of Control population: 466,881 tests - 3 probable mutations show showed
no significant differences.
BIER V ESTIMATE OF SPONTANEOUS
BURDEN OF GENETIC DISEASE IN MAN.
| TYPE |
INCIDENCE/1,000
LIVE BIRTHS |
| DOMINANT |
10 |
| X-LINKED |
0.4 |
| RECESSIVE |
2.5 |
| CHROMOSOMAL
ABNORMALITY |
4.4 |
| CONGENITAL
ABNORMALITY |
20-30 |
| OTHER
MULTIFACTORAL TRAITS* |
120 |
*Includes heart disease,
cancer, and other diseases of complex etiology with probable hereditary
compound
PROBLEMS FOR RADIATION
GENETICS STUDIES IN PEOPLE:
- Detecting increases in
genetic disease due to radiation in the face of this large spontaneous
burden is difficult.
- Controlling for other
variables which affect the incidence of genetic diseases is also difficult.
FINDINGS FROM EXPERIMENTAL
ANIMALS (General findings)
- Most genetic mutations
are deleterious
- Radiation does not produce
novel mutations, but instead increases the incidence of mutations occurring
naturally.
- No evidence for threshold
has been found.
- Fractionation/protraction
of radiation dose generally protects.
- Quality of radiation -
important (RBE increases with LET)
- In mice - response of
males and females differ. This reflects difference in the cell proliferation
patterns of the oocytes and spermatogonia, and differences in the relative
sensitivities of the various cell types.
- Genetic consequences are
generally reduced when time interval is allowed between irradiation and
conception.