Urban Affairs Review

Problems, Questions, or Comments regarding the website can be addressed to the webmaster.

 

 

Editors

Susan E. Clarke

University of Colorado, Boulder

Gary L. Gaile

University of Colorado, Boulder

Michael A. Pagano

University of Illinois at Chicago

Book Review Editor

Timothy Krebs

University of New Mexico

Managing Editor

Jaime Masterson

University of Illinois at Chicago

Sponsored by The Great Cities Institute at the University of Illinois at Chicago

 

Chicago photo courtesy of www.windycityart.com

Current Issue: May 2008

Locational Patterns of Low Income Housing Tax Credit Developments: A Sociospatial Analysis of Four Metropolitan Areas, by Deirdre Oakley

Strategic, Geographic Targeting of Housing and Community Development Resources: A Conceptual Framework and Critical Review, by Dale E. Thomson

Taming the Local Leviathon: Institutional and Economic Constraints on Municipal Budgets, by Michael Craw

Communities, the Private Sector, and the State: Contested Forms of Security Governance in Cape Town and Johannesburg , by Claire Benit-Gbaffou, Sophie Didier, and Marianne Morange

Research Note:

Influences on the Sense of Neighborhood: Case of Slovenia , by Masa Filipovic

 

Upcoming Issue:

 

Special Sections:

Urban Colloquy

Urban Colloquy features brief, engaging, and timely essays on contemporary urban issues and emerging intellectual debates. By drawing on UAR Board Members and reviewers, we can promise an expedited peer-review process and publication schedule. We invite UAR readers to take advantage of this opportunity to reflect on our times and the role of urban scholarship.

For examples of this type of article, see UAR, vol 38(1), September 2002

New Directions

New Directions is a section in the Urban Affairs Review that features peer-reviewed articles that use innovative research strategies to address important theoretical and empirical issues. By highlighting a full range of methodological approaches, we hope to encourage urban scholars to move beyond the quantitative debates, conventional case study versus large N orientations, and applied versus basic research. Although reviewers will continue to critically examine the logic of inquiry, the rigor of the analyses, and the unique contributions of each article, they are also being asked to assess innovative and interesting methodological strategies. We invite UAR readers to submit manuscripts that will contribute to the theoretical and methodological diversity of the journal.

For examples of this type of article, see UAR, vol 40(5), November 2002