IPCE Theory of Change

 

The IPCE Theory of Change explains how we contribute to creating more informed and engaged communities. As with all theories, ours begins with making some assumptions about the kinds of activities and resources that lead to the short-term outcomes and long-term impacts we seek to achieve. We assume that facilitating public discourse, helping citizens learn about policy issues, and creating a more effective and responsive government are the ‘levers’ of civic engagement. Most of our assumptions have been proven by research to make a difference. To move these ‘levers’ we need inputs such as financial resources, internal and external partners, and assistance from university faculty, staff, and students. These input resources are the fuel for our activities, which includes our research, discourse, and educational programs such as supporting town halls and other public discourse events, leadership development, and research projects. Our activities lead to our outcomes, which are the immediate results of our work. Rigorous evaluation of outcomes and ongoing research will enable us to determine the extent to which our outcomes lead to the long-term impacts that IPCE seeks to achieve.


Assumptions
We believe that the levers of civic engagement are:
  • Participation in public discourse among citizens, government, and other stakeholders
  • Education on policy issues
  • Education about government
  • Use of technology to facilitate education and discourse

Inputs
To move these levers, IPCE needs:
  • UIC staff, faculty, and students
  • Access to technology
  • External partners
  • Financial resources from the University
  • External financial resources
  • Research to inform our action

Activities
Key IPCE activities include:
  • Research and community engagement
  • Public discourse
  • Civic Engagement at UIC
  • Education and leadership development for youth and adults
  • CivicSource web portal
  • Training for government

Outcomes
Key IPCE outcomes include:
  • New research on technology and civic engagement
  • Youth and young adults develop leadership skills
  • More citizens engage in public discourse
  • Government staff and officials have increased capacity to use technology
  • Citizens have a better understanding of policy issues

Impacts
  • A more informed and engaged citizenry
  • A more effective and responsive government


  •