Building
knowledge infrastructure at the engaged urban research university.
A thought-piece for the Great Cities Urban Data Visualization
Retreat, 12/10/99, by
Albert Schorsch, III,
Associate/Acting Dean, UIC-CUPPA
schorsch@uic.edu
12/9/99
[This is a working document in progress. Your comments are welcome.]
Two of the policy buzzword "kennings" of the information
age are "information infrastructure" and "knowledge
network." This essay examines some necessary steps to build
networks of knowledge about cities and regions amidst the robust
and growing information infrastructure provided by large urban
research universities, and how this growing knowledge can better
serve the public.
When we consider knowledge infrastructure as opposed to information
infrastructure, we examine not only the acquisition and manufacture
of new information tools, but also the growth and deepening of
human relationships within which these tools are used. This growth
and deepening can lead to better shared understanding of the information
and data available throughout information networks, and to increased
public participation based upon increased public knowledge.
Putting flesh and bones on what was just dryly stated, at the
University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC), growing awareness of
a number of shared ideals have driven our efforts almost from
the beginning: (a) that public information should be made extensively
available to the public, (b) that technology should be shaped
to reduce information boundaries among persons and public institutions,
(c) that interdisciplinary work among scholars was absolutely
necessary to make effective contributions in complex urban and
regional environments, and (d) that collaborations among university
and community should break down barriers between public and expert
culture and produce true partnerships, further informing research.
These values are shared across UIC through our urban land grant
Great Cities Initiative, integrated into our research agendas,
and make possible our many interdisciplinary efforts. They also
inform our approach, which situates research tasks within wider
social and inter-cultural settings with multiple points of contact
and multiple flows of information. We recognize that the community
and university are dual producers of knowledge, and the data leading
to it. The old "urban mission" of UIC has thus been
anticipating and working toward what NSF has called "knowledge
networks" for quite some time. Implied in these ideals is
something of a Socratic optimism, that the better we know ourselves
and our world, the better we may do as fellow citizens.
Given the task of deepening our capacity for mutual knowledge
among our municipalities and regions, and given our desire to
gain mutual knowledge, we must admit the daunting nature of the
challenges which face us.
What we don't know about cities and regions still overshadows
what we do. Because of the growing complexity of regional environments,
economies, and governments, this will remain true for the foreseeable
future. The day of the single talking-head media "urban expert,"
is over. The complexity of urban and regional analysis is such
that entire teams of researchers and citizens are necessary to
address the larger research questions pertaining to public policy.
After more than a half-century of urban and regional research,
many important public policy decisions are still made on a "seat
of the pants" basis, with a generational time lag in error
correction, or, for want of information or knowledge, simple superstitious
policy reversal on a cyclical "seat of the pants" basis.
Public data is often unavailable, incompatible, and disappearing.
The cumulative record of public policy action within this region
lies in thousands of public and semi-public databases, within
incompatible systems, each in various stages of mixed maintenance,
decay, or expiration.
Information, knowledge, and analysis still remain buried, or
unconnected. Universities and independent urban scholars produce
vast amounts of knowledge that remains invisible to the public.
Faculty studies, student theses and projects with their related
data, especially those that pertain to neighborhoods or regions,
are often stored in faculty or departmental offices, and eventually
disappear.
Software systems are not integrated. The World Wide Web as a
medium has required us to integrate or bridge across software
packages to make public data available. Database, Geographic Information
Systems, three-dimensional software, and Internet display tools
must be merged into one integrated medium for better public access
and participation. Some of this task is beyond the capacity of
a university, and can only be accomplished by industry. But the
universities can pioneer key approaches to the problem.
Geography challenges us as the urban and regional catalog. UIC
has taken a lead, through the cooperative work of the UIC Great
Cities Urban Data Visualization Program and UIC City Design Center
and its Chicago Imagebase project (http://www.uic.edu/depts/ahaa/imagebase/)
in developing the technologies necessary for multi-layered browsing
of maps, images, and data catalogued by underlying GIS, with the
future goal in mind of "fly-through" visualization of
urban space, from which maps, images, historical documents, and
data applets can be called, as Web browsing moves more to a television-like
medium. Faculty from UIC have joined in discussion with USC's
ISLA project for Los Angeles (http://www.usc.edu/isd/locations/cst/ISLA/),
and are discussing the development of research agendas to hurdle
various obstacles. Among these obstacles are visualization tools
for extremely large datasets, the challenges of distributed computing,
and the difficulties of simultaneous database management of text,
data, sound, and images within a layered geographic scheme. Research
on these questions builds the capacity of "libraries of the
future."
Existing computing power is not utilized. Large public databases
can now be crunched with today's increased computing power, but
much must be done in terms of obtaining, correcting, formatting,
combining, documenting, and preserving this data. We have not
linked large public databases with the computing power necessary
to analyze changes in public life due to changes in public policy,
nor have we installed available software for urban and regional
analysis on our most powerful computers.
Human and computer networks decay unless they are maintained,
and sustained. In the UIC Neighborhoods and NonProfits Network
project (UIC-NNNet) (http://www.uic.edu/~schorsch) funded by US
Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information
Administration, Telecommunication and Information Infrastructure
Assistance Program (NTIA-TIIAP) from 1994-1996, UIC connected
fifty community institutions primarily in the Chicago neighborhoods
of Pilsen (predominantly Hispanic American) and the Near West
Side (predominantly African American) to dial-in Internet accounts
at UIC, trained members of these organizations in e-mail and web
skills, and programmed and published the database of the Donors
Forum of Chicago on the web. The near five-year experience of
the UIC-NNNet has led to insights into the effects of university-community
cooperation, and a better understanding of the organization, technologies,
and tools required by knowledge networks. Some of these later
were summarized in the UIC-NNNet "Lessons Learned" and
anthropologist's qualitative report. Among the principal discoveries
were the roles that both social network decay and equipment decay
play in the sustainability of "community computing"
efforts, and how personal acquaintance and site visits build such
a successful effort. UIC has run the course from technical assistance,
to partnership, and in recent years to university-community knowledge
network building, and this progression has only reaffirmed the
need for continual maintenance and commitment to the human networks
behind the computer networks.
University-Community cooperation must be intentional, not accidental.
The advanced research capacities of a major university must continually
be put into the hands of community institutions to produce data
which can inform these institutions and others about changes in
their interactions and quality of life due to their own activities.
This accumulated data and imagery must not only be preserved and
catalogued, but continually made more visible and accessible for
shared discussion and analysis. We need to construct not only
a "university that sees and listens" but "university
that does not forget," and, after much interdisciplinary
effort, a "university that is transparent."
Long learning curves challenge us in key software and data management
applications. The mastery of tools which unlock patterns in data
and images, such as GIS, require a year or two of active practice
prior to proficiency. So too for the learning of skills necessary
to maintain the underlying computer networks, and to visualize
data from these systems.
The lack of personnel in new, conjoint disciplines. Economic
geography emerges as a key discipline from within this medium,
serving other disciplines and their analysis. Planner-programmers,
for that matter, scientist-programmers in most research disciplines,
become necessary for progress across the boundaries of software
packages and analysis.
The human dimension can get lost in the Internet medium. At the
heart of both public and university life are conversation and
narrative. Information dispersed through computers without a "human
face," without human comment, or without a human being at
"the other end of the line," removes the communicative
and participative dimension from the medium. The medium must continually
be constructed to bring persons in contact with each, and to make
conversation possible, even likely.
Possible Research Agenda:
It is possible, given the challenges above, to assemble a research
agenda involving many university disciplines. This list, because
of time constraints, is very basic, and we'll fill it out more
during the GCUDV retreat on 12/10/99.
A. The construction, visualization, and preservation of longitudinal
regional databases (possible funder, NSF "Enhancing Infrastructure
for the Social and Behavioral Sciences" and "Extremely
Large Dataset Visualization" programs.).
The county assessor databases for this region, going back almost
thirty years, with years soon to be lost, are the bedrock of urban
and regional analysis in many disciplines. CUPPA and UIC Library
have discussed a joint role here, and have begun to approach the
differing assessors. If these databases can be combined and preserved,
most disciplines concerned with public policy in this region can
tap into this data and its related imagery.
B. The strategic management of public databases (possible funder,
NSF "Digital Government" program). This might involve
a collaboration among Public Administration, IDS, and Engineering
programs.
C. Regional data access/preservation projects of encyclopedic
scope. Among these are the Chicago Imagebase (mentioned above,
various funders), the Chicago Community Fact Book (on which CUPPA-GCUDV,
CDC-Imagebase, and UIC Sociology have cooperated with GCUDV funds),
and the unfunded project, the Chicago Encyclopedia of Regional
Policy and Development.
D. Regional data correction/update projects. Ongoing work of
various geographic agencies, various state and federal funders.
F. New forms of public participation, comment. On 12/10/99 at
the GCUDV retreat, we'll demonstrate the new GCUDV technology
being developed to allow the public to comment on public issues
on a web-based map, with the map updating based upon their comments
(NSF ITS funding is being sought). Such a technology will have
great impact on public commentary on public action in the years
to come.
Pitfalls:
Research and technical assistance projects must cooperate, but
maintain separate spaces and trajectories. When a university invents
a useful tool, it is important that research on this tool progress
toward its effective testing and completion. There is great pressure
to put a useful tool to work in public technical assistance projects
immediately, and a danger of overwhelming the research team with
calls, personal appearances, applied projects, etc., prior to
the completion of the work.
Educational Agenda:
At the GCUDV retreat, we'll discuss the training and education
support that GCUDV has begun to provide to meet the "learning
curve" problems cited above.
Comments to: schorsch@uic.edu
|