Community
Development Options: An Assessment of the Economic Conditions in Uptown
Project Number: 219 Report Date: April 1986 Author(s):
John Betancur, Lynn McCormick The Voice of the People in Uptown has
provided a variety of services to low and moderate income residents of Uptown
since its establishment in 1968. As a community-based housing developer, the Voice
has concentrated on rehabilitating abandoned and deteriorated housing for this
constituency. Although economic development has always been a part of Voice's
mission statement, past efforts in that direction have been confined to a job
training program in housing rehabilitation skills and a short-lived woodshop business
spinoff. In recent years, however, several factors have induced the Voice to
take a closer look at economic development for Uptown's residents. First of all,
the need for economic development for Uptown's low-income residents has become
increasingly apparent to Voice. Also, as Voice's housing development and management
programs have become more stable, the organization is now in a position to address
Uptown's economic needs more directly. Although a new focus, the Voice feels that
many of the organizational skills it has learned in community-based housing development
are transferable to economic development. The national economic and political
situation also presents a strong case for the Voice to place greater effort on
initiating economic development strategies in addition to housing development.
Dwindling public resources and commitment for subsidized housing at the federal
level are necessitating the introduction of other mechanisms to bring about community
development. The beginning of a planning process on economic development at
Voice was a search for additional information about economic development strategies
appropriate for Voice to undertake. This search prompted the Voice to engage the
Center for Urban Economic Development at the University of Illinois at Chicago
(CUED) to assist in its economic development planning efforts. From the start,
the development of an economic development strategies plan for the Voice of the
People has been a learning process, especially as this process leads both the
staff and Board of Voice into a new substantive area and away from the field of
housing in which it has gained considerable expertise and credibility. The Voice
formed an Economic Development Committee, comprised of members of its Board, its
staff, and its existing tenancy, to direct this learning process. Input from Voice
residents and community leaders was also ensured through a formal survey of a
sample of these groups. The survey inquired about Uptown's economic problems and
the appropriate role for the Voice in solving them. As the learning process
was initiated, the Committee identified two areas that it would like to know more
about; 1) the types of economic development strategies that had been implemented
by other not-for-profit community-based organizations and 2) the specific opportunities
and problems that present themselves in terms of Uptown's economy and the ability
of its residents to secure jobs. These emphases were used in formulating the process
by which the Voice would undertake its economic development strategies plan.
In order to evaluate the various approaches to economic development, the Committee
did several things. The first activity it engaged in was a workshop held by CUED
for Voice's Economic Development Committee and staff. The workshop focused on
a discussion of economic development strategies employed by other groups locally
or across the country. Four types of strategies were described:
1) those that relate to Planning and Research, 2) to Community Organizing,
3) to Business Development and 4) to Skill Training. (See the Appendix for details
of the workshop agenda.) Following the workshop, the Committee engaged in a
general discussion of economic development and criteria that any economic development
venture should address. The committee developed the following working list of
criteria for Voice initiated economic development projects and grouped them based
on High, Moderate or Low Relative Importance. The committee also decided to
evaluate Voice's existing program areas, housing management and housing development,
for possibilities of creating economic development projects from ongoing or currently
new activities in these areas. This assessment is being pursued by small working
committees of the Board and staff. Following a look at and discussion of various
economic development approaches, the second part of the Voice's economic development
planning process centered on Uptown's economy. CUED and Voice began a data gathering
phase to find out more about Uptown as a neighborhood economy, the skills and
capabilities of its residents, and opportunities for community economic development
as perceived by other local organizations. More specifically, it involved a compilation
of data about Uptown from published material. Three publications were primarily
used: the U.S. Department of Commerce's Census of Population, Where Workers Work
in the Chicago Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area put out by the Illinois
Department of Employment Security, and Dun and Bradstreet Data Files. The data
gathering part of this process also involved the pulling together of additional
information about Uptown's problems, opportunities, and its residents by surveying
Voice's tenants as well as a sample of community leaders and organizations active
in Uptown. A detailed description of the methodology employed in this project
is included in the Appendix. The results of the data gathering phase of the
Voice's economic development strategies planning process are described in this
report. The next section, part II, contains a presentation of data about Uptown's
residents and workforce. Part III describes the business sector in Uptown and
opportunities it affords local residents. The fourth and fifth sections, respectively,
discuss the findings of a survey of the Voice's tenancy and local community organizations.
The final section pulls together the variety of conclusions offered in each part,
it discusses key issues the Voice must debate before deciding upon a final direction
in economic development, and it suggests recommendations for further action by
the Voice of the People. |