|
Facilitating
Federal Technology Transfer to Small and Medium Sized Business and State
and Local Government Project Number: 179
Report Date: January 1984 Author(s): James Debettencourt, Wim Wiewel, Rob
Mier In a discrete technology, will address the needs of the user groups.
In addition, because of the general lack of in-house technical sophistication
among our user groups, a significant amount of assistance may be needed to address
technical problems and implement technical solutions. The technology outputs
of the federal laboratories also require the definition to include these three
components of technology transfer. Most of the major products of federal R & D
are not discrete technologies that can be used by smaller business or state and
local government, but technical information and expertise. This results from the
lack of federal R & D conducted primarily to respond to these groups' needs. Most
of this R & D is conducted to respond to federal government needs and therefore
may require the identification of secondary uses in order to satisfy the needs
of our user groups. Even when a secondary use is identified, in many cases it
may be necessary to further develop the product or process because either the
technology is not at the stage of commercialization or it must be adapted to fit
the specific need of the user. Present federal technology transfer programs
have been successful when the technology recipient and the federal agencies' R
& D missions are closely related. (The U.S. Dept. of Agricultures' Cooperative
Extension Service is a well-known mission related technology transfer program).
The need for identification of secondary uses, and the resulting need for adaptations
of technologies, distinguishes the primary focus of this report from existing
technology transfer efforts. When a secondary use must be identified before utilization,
the link between potential users and technologies becomes much less direct. These
difficulties, coupled with the specific needs of the targeted user groups for
technical information and technical assistance, necessitates a new technology
transfer mechanism. Several recommendations are made in this report. One is
the establishment of a federal laboratory data base to include this information
and an ordered search process that could make more efficient use of laboratory
personnel and expertise. Another involves a consistent method for commercial evaluation
of technologies and standard criteria for private sector use of federal laboratory
expertise. Our proposed conclusions and recommendations are designed to lead to
increased access to federal technologies and technical information by all potential
users. They contain specific measures designed to provide smaller business and
state and local governments with a greater ability to utilize federal technology.
These recommendations are discussed in three sections:
A) Modifications to the Federal Laboratory Secondary Utilization System
B) Transfer Mechanism for Smaller Business and State and Local Government
C) Implementation of the Industrial Extension System Model |
|
|
UIC
Center for Urban Economic Development (M/C 345)
College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs
400 South Peoria Street, Suite 2100, Chicago, Illinois, 60607-7035
Phone: (312) 996-6336 Fax: (312) 996-5766
This website is maintained by Cedric
Williams, Manager System Services,
UIC-Center for Urban Economic Development
|
|