Topics of the day:
1. Paul Johnson on Sassouni cephalometric
analysis
2. Chin cup and the sore chin
3. Re: Facemask chin irritation
4. Re: Chin cup irritation
5. Response to Facemask Irritation
6. Re: Facemask Irritation Problem
7. Re: Facemask Irritation Problem
8. Irritation (skin) with chin cap
9. Response Screw implants
10. Facemask on Down's Syndrome patient
11. ESCO - The Electronic Study Club for Orthodontics
| Date: | Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:29:03 -0800 (PST) |
| From: | "PAUL JOHNSON" <p8johnson@yahoo.com> |
| To: | "ESCO POST" <esco@listserv.uic.edu> |
| Subject: | Paul Johnson on Sassouni cephalometric analysis |
S 7. An aid in the extraction
decision.
Dear
group,
These thoughts may help answer the question posed by Dr. Gupta:

Figs. 1 and 2 have too many MB to go on a single e-mail (that was until Dr. Halazonetis pointed out how to compress the images using 150 dpi in scanning); therefore, fig. 1 had to be included here on S 7, and fig. 2 was on S 8.
The
attachment (1) illustrates an extreme DEEP BITE SKELETAL case from the
perspective of the Sassouni Analysis.
The osteological part illustrates that teeth should not be removed,
if at all possible. A
percentage of orthodontic patients fall into this category, and
extractions, especially on the mandibular arch (and also on the maxillary
arch), would not be desirable.
Please
enlarge the top left part of fig. 1 maximally, using the magnifying glass
with the plus sign inside the “glass,” to appreciate the rationale for
the points in S 7. It is the
lateral skull view.
Considering
that orthodontics is an art rather than an exact science, I would prefer
minor crowding on the lower arch one year after the end of retention
rather than extract and get bite collapse in this deep bite situation.
Bite collapse could cause the operator to wish that those teeth
that were removed were back in there, for vertical support.
“You can always take them out, but you cannot put them back.”
Here
is another beautiful aspect to this analysis: it not only tells you what
to do, it instructs you, more importantly, what not to do.
One
of the most difficult practice decisions is to decide when extractions are
necessary in the “borderline” case where the dentition can be treated
successfully either way. Sassouni’s
graphic representation, with no numbers, is a great help deciding which
would be the best approach. If
the analysis tips the scales toward the “Deep Bite Skeletal” (Fig. 1)
configuration and Dentistry’s Gnathological Principles are a part of our
armamentarium, then non-extraction might be the diagnostic option.
Extracting in these deep bite cases could create the need for some
difficult mechano-therapy to rectify the loss of units.
Hippocrates
said, “First of all do no harm.”
“Borderline” extraction cases are the challenge for us.
(1)
Attachment Fig. 1 was reprinted with permission from Elsevier: Sassouni,
Viken, D.D.S., M.S., D.Sc., A Classification of Skeletal Facial Types,
American Journal of Orthodontics, 55(2): pp. 109-123 © 1969.
Regards,
Paul
Johnson (retired orthodontist)
Tustin,
CA
| Date: | Wed, 21 Jan 2004 08:55:03 +0200 |
| From: | "adrian becker" <adrianb@cc.huji.ac.il> |
| To: | "The Electronic Study Club for Orthodontics" <ESCO@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU> |
| Subject: | Chin cup and the sore chin |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Jan 2004 09:08:33 +1000 |
| From: | "Brett Kerr" <bkerr@uq.net.au> |
| To: | "The Electronic Study Club for Orthodontics" <ESCO@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU> |
| Subject: | Re: Facemask chin irritation |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Jan 2004 09:53:36 EST |
| From: | JMer1997@aol.com |
| To: | ESCO@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU |
| Subject: | Re: Chin cup irritation |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:50:50 -0800 (PST) |
| From: | "George Papanastasoulis" <papanasg@yahoo.com> |
| To: | esco@listserv.uic.edu |
| Subject: | Response to Facemask Irritation |
Hi Carol and the rest of the group, it is great to hear from everyone again. Concerning your question about facemask irritation on the chin, we experienced the same problems, and found the solution which works for us: simply put we have the patients buy Dr. Scholl's shoe inserts (the beige inserts, non scented with air holes in them). The patients then merely cut out the form of the chin portion and adhere it to the chin pad via two way tape. The irritation (redness) does not persist because of the air pockets and spongy effect of the cushion. Hope this helps, and let me know about your results. George Papanastasoulis Montreal, Canada Orthodontist
| Date: | Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:50:50 -0800 |
| From: | "Jeff Genecov" <c0018593@airmail.net> |
| To: | esco@listserv.uic.edu |
| Subject: | Re: Facemask Irritation Problem |
We have had great success with a chamois cloth. We have them cut the chamois
in the shape of the pad and put it between the pad and the skin. Some of the
moms have even made a removable cover out of the chamois for each of the pads so
it can slide on and off easily. A real, as opposed to synthetic, chamois
works best, and it can be washed as needed to remove the oils from the skin that
are absorbed. The real chamois can be bought at any auto parts store.
Regards,
Jeff Genecov, DDS, MSD, FICD
| Date: | Thu, 22 Jan 2004 08:41:50 -0800 |
| From: | "Robert Haeger" <rhaeger@seanet.com> |
| To: | esco@listserv.uic.edu |
| Subject: | Re: Facemask Irritation Problem |
Dear Carol Stuckey,
| Date: | Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:28:47 +0530 |
| From: | "Dr, M.Jayaram" <koz_anchorag@sancharnet.in> |
| To: | "The Electronic Study Club for Orthodontics" <ESCO@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU> |
| CC: | castuck@bellsouth.net |
| Subject: | Irritation (skin) with chin cap |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:57:49 -0800 (PST) |
| From: | "George Papanastasoulis" <papanasg@yahoo.com> |
| To: | esco@listserv.uic.edu |
| Subject: | Response Screw implants |
Hi all, We are presently using the palatal implant from Straumann in our practice for Mx anchorage, with great results (associated with TPA). On the lower arch we have started using microscrews (inserted by our periodontist) at the attached gingival level. In cases where we need to retract the anterior segment (ie: recent case of Cl II div I, surgical, patient had exo'd bombed out 37,47 and we needed to retract the flared out lower anteriors rather than exoing the 34,44.....38,48 were erupting into position), we placed open coil between 36-35 and 46-45, and ligature tied the 35,45 to the microscrews in order to prevent the flaring of the anterior segment. When the 6's were retracted, we simply retied the ligature tie back to the 4's and proceeded to distalize the 5's and so on. Hope this is what you were looking for as an answer, if not write back. Thanks for listening to my two cents worth, George Papanastasoulis Monteal, Canada Orthodontist
| Date: | Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:01:03 -0800 (PST) |
| From: | "George Papanastasoulis" <papanasg@yahoo.com> |
| To: | esco@listserv.uic.edu |
| Subject: | Facemask on Down's Syndrome patient |
Dear
Colleague:
The Electronic Study Club for Orthodontics (ESCO) is a free forum for exchange of information and opinions among orthodontists, and for distribution of professional information, sponsored by the Department of Orthodontics, University
*
What information can you get on ESCO?
*
How to subscribe to ESCO?
*
How to change your address?
*
How to post messages on ESCO?
*
How to get copies of old digests of ESCO?
For
answers to these questions and more, please check our web site: http://www.uic.edu/depts/dort/esco.html
To view and search old digests, please view our web site: http://listserv.uic.edu/archives/esco.html
Enjoy
your reading!