Topics of the day:
1. Re: Lower implants, ESCO Digest #2004-2
2. Bart Conroy's Clinical Question from patient.
3. Internet data base cephx system for communication
4. Facemask chin irritation
5. Variability with RPE
6. Class III - Facemask alternative
7. Re: Screw implants
8. Preliminary review of several medium to high-range digital cameras
9. ESCO - The Electronic Study Club for Orthodontics
| From: | "Marco_Tribň" <marco.tribo@tribo.ch> |
| To: | "The Electronic Study Club for Orthodontics" <ESCO@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU> |
| Subject: | Re. Lower implants, ESCO Digest #2004-2 |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:05:27 +0100 |



| Date: | Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:52:50 -0800 |
| From: | "Bart Conroy" <bwconroy@pacbell.net> |
| Subject: | Bart Conroy's Clinical Question from patient. |
| To: | "'Joseph Zernik'" <orthodl@hsc.usc.edu> |
| From: | "Zeev Abraham" <zeevab@bezeqint.net> |
| To: | esco@listserv.uic.edu |
| Subject: | Internet data base cephx system for communication |
| Date: | Sat, 24 Jan 2004 09:34:19 +0200 |
| Date: | Sat, 24 Jan 2004 11:49:15 -0300 (ART) |
| From: | "priscila ribeiro" <priscilaribeiro123@yahoo.com.br> |
| Subject: | Facemask chin irritation |
| To: | esco@listserv.uic.edu |
| CC: | castuck@bellsouth.net |
| Date: | Sat, 24 Jan 2004 12:04:30 -0300 (ART) |
| From: | "priscila ribeiro" <priscilaribeiro123@yahoo.com.br> |
| Subject: | Variability with RPE |
| To: | esco@listserv.uic.edu |
| CC: | jsmileb@netwurx.net |
| Date: | Sun, 25 Jan 2004 11:41:17 -0500 |
| From: | "Leon Klempner" <drleon@optonline.net> |
| Subject: | Class III - Facemask alternative |
| To: | "'The Electronic Study Club for Orthodontics'" <ESCO@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU> |
The problem of skin irritation with facemask therapy has been a persistent problem which can significantly impact patient compliance and subsequently the clinical result. In the December 1999 JCO, a Korean group published a case study using a “Tandem appliance”. I have made a few modifications of the original design and have had excellent results that are comparable to the results with a facemask. I’ve completed about 15 cases (with before and after records) and have published it in the April 2003 JCO. I have included a hyperlink to the article and have no financial interest in the appliance.
Leon S. Klempner, D.D.S., P.C.
Long Island, New York
| Date: | Mon, 26 Jan 2004 19:46:10 -0600 |
| From: | "Paul Thomas" <pm.thomas@GTE.NET> |
| Subject: | Re: Screw implants |
| To: | "'The Electronic Study Club for Orthodontics'" <ESCO@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU> |
To those interested. Gene Roberts' technique of the mandibular retromolar implant is outdated given the current deviced available. If you look at the date of the paper it was at least 10 years ago. He was using prototype implants (later off the shelf) to provide "indirect anchorage to protract a molar. Today, you can use one of the devices which is cheaper, smaller, can be loaded immediately and used for direct anchorage.
Kindest Regards, Paul M Thomas, DMD, MS
Senior Research Fellow: Eastman Dental Institute for Oral Healthcare Sciences
London, England
| Date: | Thr, 29 Jan 2004 10:46:10 -0500 |
| From: | "Yunqing Pan" <ypan3@uic.edu> |
| Subject: | Preliminary review of several medium to high-range digital cameras |
| To: | "'The Electronic Study Club for Orthodontics'" <ESCO@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU> |
*** See attached file (cameras.xls)***
Many orthodontists have been confronting problems with
choosing the right kind of digital camera for intraoral
photography. In the attached Excel Spreadsheet, we present a
preliminary review of several medium to high-range digital
cameras.
We would like to call your attention to the new Minolta Dimage A1 5MP camera. It's based on the design of Minolta 7i and 7Hi. But the shutter speed, aperture range, white balancing all get improvements. In addition, Minolta Dimage A1 5MP camera has the world first anti-shaking system that can make intraoral photography much easier. Considering the relatively low price ($680 currently on the market), this is definitely worth considering.
Canon EOS 300D (Rebel) produces the best image quality. But the lens are optional, which may cost a lot. Also, this camera is a PRO SLR camera. It may not be so easy to use and handle.
The standards used to select the six cameras are as follows:
1. Market Price < $1000. Therefore, most pro-SLR cameras by Nikon, Canon, Leica and Olympus didn't make the list.
2. Resolution > 5MP.
3. Must use a high-speed and inexpensive CF memory card. Therefore, SONY cameras didn't make the list.
4. Must have relatively high customer review. Therefore, those Kodak and Fuji low-priced 5MP cameras didn't make the list. 5. Must have features and attachments for intraoral photography.
Most data were collected from camera manufacturer websites. The reviews and comparison data were collected from dpreview.com and imaging-resources.com.
Please open the attached Excel spreadsheet for more information on our review.
Yunqing Pan
Department of Orthodontics, University of Illinois at Chicago
Dear Colleague:
The Electronic Study Club for Orthodontics (ESCO) is a free forum for exchange of information and opinions among orthodontists, and for distribution of professional information, sponsored by the Department of Orthodontics, University of Illinois at Chicago . Information distributed on this list-server is NOT edited or refereed, and it represents only the opinions of the writers of the individual messages. Such w riters bear the sole responsibility for the content of messages they author. Authors are required to verify information regarding other parties included in their messages.
* What information can you get on ESCO?
* How to subscribe to ESCO?
* How to change your address?
* How to post messages on ESCO?
* How to get copies of old digests of ESCO?
For answers to these questions and more, please check our web site: http://www.uic.edu/depts/dort/esco.html
To view and search old digests, please view our web site: http://listserv.uic.edu/archives/esco.html
Enjoy your reading!