Topics of the day:

1. Putting orthodontics into perspective
2. Re: Bonded lingual retainer
3. Re: polyethylene sheets? use C+
4. Re: New source for retainer material
5. MRIs and fixed orthodontic appliances
6. Arbitration agreement
7. ESCO - The Electronic Study Club for Orthodontics

 


From: "GJ/RR Oppenhuizen" <doctoro@macatawa.com>
To: "The Electronic Study Club for Orthodontics" <ESCO@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU>
Subject: Putting orthodontics into perspective
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 08:33:43 -0400

If the questions you ask lead to paradox, I would suggest that you are asking the wrong questions. Perhaps the question may only clearly demonstrate that you fundamentally misunderstand on an intrinsic level.

I read Dr. Mollenhauer's FRO newsletter reprint with a smile on my face. I wonder how many of us waded through the article. I doubt that many of us spend much time with questioning the fundamentals which form the basis of the way we think. My perspective is that the scientific thinker, which is selected for in dental education, generally has little interest in deeply questioning the accepted underpinnings of their worldview. Perhaps I am mistaken.

Karl Rahner, a Catholic theologian concluded that there are two major groups of people in the world: those who demand certainty and those who seek understanding.

As muddy as the picture is that Dr. Mollenhauer presented, I would chime-in that he has introduced for discussion only the Western scientific world view analysis of the Western scientific/philosophical world view. The picture is much larger and even more ethereal.

As a primer a book that I would recommend to all is: Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance (An Inquiry into Values) by Robert Pirsig published about 40 years ago. It is a great story that incorporates an erudite treatise of the concept of ‘quality'. It brings in another world view to this discussion which sheds much light on the dark places that Dr. Mollenhauer has alluded to in his newsletter article. The book opens doors that you may have not known were even there.

A critique of scientific thought should step outside of the intellectual stew which spawned Western scientific thinking. You might be amazed, or perhaps, simply bored beyond words.

Anyway, science has much value for us, but creating aligned teeth and a beautiful face and smile is much more like being an outstanding sculptor than a scientist. Orthodontists prioritize their values, apply what they believe, and work to attain their goals. Even what anyone of us might consider to be outstanding may fall far short if assessed by a different set of parameters. Does that make what was done poor or inadequate? Is Picasso a better artist than Da Vinci? Could Picasso recreate the work of DaVinci or DaVinci the work of Picasso? Can Dr Joe Blow create Michelangelo's David if he just listens and applies what science tells us? What do you think?

Is it the right question or are we fundamentally missing something on a pretty basic level?

Greg Oppenhuizen
Holland, MI
doctoro@macatawa.com

 


From: Typodont@aol.com
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 23:54:39 EDT
Subject: Re: Bonded lingual retainers
To: ESCO@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU

Re: Bonded lingual retainers

Greetings Jen,

It's nice to see a discussion on retention.  It seems to be the "forgotten" phase of orthodontic treatment and I wonder how effective we are at presenting this topic in our postgraduate residency programs as well as in our scientific/clinical forums.   Someone once said (to the effect) that "Retention is more than just a problem; It is the problem".  And I could not agree more with that sentiment.  Textbooks and journals have little information other than technique presentations on retainers, etc.  In this area, there is not enough evidence based information available and most of us have to rely upon our experience (good or bad) to help us formulate effective protocols in private practice.

I agree with Charlie Ruff.  At this moment, fixed retention offers a great deal in reducing post-treatment problems.  And I agree with the lower canine to canine fixed retainer use and upper lateral to lateral placement as well.  The "social six" or front porch (as they say down south) are the most visible areas and are frequently the cause of patient dissatisfaction and annoyance to the orthodontist.    

We published an article in the JCO recently (Moskowitz, Park, and Maestre, October 2004)) on the use of the Ortho Flextech material from Reliance for lower lingual retainers.  We have been using this material for several years and find that it is superior to other types of lower lingual retention arches. 

As far as teeth shifting even with lingual arches in place?  Many of these lingual arches (especially the rigid variety) are distorted over time by the patient.  These lingual arches, intended to hold the teeth, actually become active orthodontic appliances.  The teeth move, and with round types of wires, can actually "torque" around the lingual arch. 

Where do retention efforts begin?  I have always contended that they begin before the first orthodontic appliance is actually inserted.  Additionally, a cursory look at the pre-treatment study casts prior to debanding  (as well as other records) will actually give the clinician a pretty good idea of where to expect retention problems. 

It appears that retention issues, especially in the lower incisor area, will be with us for quite some time.  It is this area (as well as others) that the physiologic ageing process simply will not respect the clinicians "best intentions".  Add to this decreased alveolar bone loss as a result of moderate to severe periodontal disease, discrete hormonal or endocrine changes as a result of either ageing or pathology,  and you can see that we have our work cut out for us. 

As an alternative to any suggestions from me or anyone else on this subject, I recommend a method of reducing retention problems almost 100%.   This might be achieved by moving out of state about every 5 years.  Such "geographical success cases" are priceless and far too rare.

Elliott M. Moskowitz,
New York City  

 


From: "Dick Carter" <drdcarter@mac.com>
Subject: Re: polyethylene sheets? use C+
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 11:43:44 -0700
To: "The Electronic Study Club for Orthodontics" <ESCO@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU>

At one time we bought hundreds of bulk sheets to use for indirect bonding, and as "slipcovers" over some bonded retainers. It was cheap, but not ideally accurate.

We switched to Raintree Essic C+ for retainers two years ago. This is durable, fits perfectly if you chill it immediately, and is the most appreciated advance in retention we have seen. If teeth are ideal when it's made, the thinness allows full arch retention without causing occlusal interferences. I don't know if it's the cheapest alternative, but for me it's the best and well worth it. I think I heard Jack Sheridan remark that the material is similar to Kevlar in bulletproof vests. We have lots of patients who have worn these faithfully, nights only, for two years and they look virtually new.

Dr Dick Carter
Orthodontist
Portland OR USA
drdcarter@mac.com

 


Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 09:41:28 -0500
From: "Kevin Walde" <kwalde@sbcglobal.net>
To: Re: New source for retainer material
Subject: Re: ESCO Digest - 12 Apr 2005 to 15 Apr 2005 (#2005-21)

Re: New source for retainer material

I was the one who posted the info on retainer material several years ago.  You can now get it at:
J.C. Finley Co.
404 E. Industrial Drive
Gerald, Missouri  63037
Phone #573-764-3990

In addition to the .040 and .020 they sell an .030 which we are now using for most cases.

Happy Trails,

Kevin Walde
Washington, MO  63090



From: "Michael Delgado" <straightnem@msn.com>
To: ESCO@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU
Subject: MRIs and fixed orthodontic appliances
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 12:21:04 -0500

I recently had a patient who is undergoing semiannual MRI's. Is there a contraindication for fixed appliance orthodontic treatment with patients undergoing regular MRI's. I honestly have never encountered this issue before last week and have not been able to contact the patient's radiologist to consult. Has anyone else faced this issue and what is the recommended course of action? The only thing that I would think would be a contraindication for having a MRI with fixed orthodontic appliances (stainless steel brackets) is that they would distort or interfere with imaging.

Mike Delgado, D.D.S., M.S.
Harker Heights, Texas


Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 12:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Todd Walkow" <twalkow@yahoo.com>
Subject: Arbitration agreement
To: "The Electronic Study Club for Orthodontics" <ESCO@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU>

ESCO Members,

Anyone have any thoughts on having new patients sign a separate "arbitration agreement."?

Todd Walkow

 


 

Dear Colleague:

The Electronic Study Club for Orthodontics (ESCO) is a free forum for exchange of information and opinions among orthodontists, and for distribution of professional information, sponsored by the Department of Orthodontics, University of Illinois at Chicago .  Information distributed on this list-server is NOT edited or refereed, and it represents only the opinions of the writers of the individual messages. Such writers bear the sole responsibility for the content of messages they author.  Authors are required to verify information regarding other parties included in their messages.  

* What information can you get on ESCO?

* How to subscribe to ESCO?

* How to change your address?

* How to post messages on ESCO?

* How to get copies of old digests of ESCO?

For answers to these questions and more, please check our web site: http://www.uic.edu/depts/dort/esco.html

To view and search old digests, please view our web site: http://listserv.uic.edu/archives/esco.html

Enjoy your reading!