Topics of the day:

1. Brand Name wires VS discount wires
2. Extraction of E's when missing 5's
3. Re: Management and imaging software
4. Re: Digital SLR Camera Settings
5. JCO May 2005
6. ESCO - The Electronic Study Club for Orthodontics


Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 11:15:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Jérôme Wanono" <>
Subject: Brand Name wires VS discount wires

Dear Dr Wachspress,
Dear Esco members,

Unfortunately, I don't know any clinical trial on Brand names wires versus discount ones. Let me share with you my experience on this subject

1 ) About NiTi wires :

A friend of mine, Dr Louis Dorval, Quebec city,  made an extensive unpublished  lab research for his Master at Montreal University on this subject. He found huge differences between the brands in terms of elasticity. The best wires were Ormco Cu-Niti, followed by Ormco Niti and GAC Sentalloy, these last two with equal results. Even 3M thermoactivated wires were performing badly compared to regular Ormco or GAC Niti ! discount wires had also poor results... Dr Dorval also found than the elastic properties of Sentalloy or Ormco NiTi were accurate for 95 % of clinical situations and recommended the use of 35 °C Cu Niti Ormco for Perio cases and cases with tooth resorption.

Clinically, I found a total correlation between these lab results and my clinical cases : discount wires are really less effective than Sentalloy or Ormco Niti. (I use mainly Speed self ligating brackets). So my attitude now is :

- small amounts of crowding, with no perio problems or resorption : discount wires round and rectangular
- large amount of crowding, with or without perio / resorption : only round 014 and 016 Sentalloys to align the arch ( very slowly with perio / resorption )  and then discount rectangular wires for leveling and allowing me to insert an SS wire as fast as I can. I don't see any interest in using rectangular brand Niti wires...

2 ) About Titane Molybdene wires :

An other friend of mine, Dr Louis Cadotte, Trois Rivières, Quebec, made the same lab study than Dr Dorval. He found that the only wire with an excellent spring back was Ormco TMA. Cerum CNA had also good results, although inferior to TMA.

Clinically, I think the choice for TMA versus other brands or discount names depend on the use you need. Cinically, I use them to :

- TPA to derotate upper molars : I make them from Masel or Lancer straight "TMA" 032 wire. I don't see any difference in efficiency with Ormco TMA.
- intrusive arch, base arch, tip back mechanism ( Burstone ), torquing anteriors : I use Lancer " TMA" or Highlands Metal ( San Jose, California ) and I'm happy with the results. Same conclusion than point one. For torquing, I found theses wires a bit too stiff than TMA. If I'm in a hurry for treatment time, anyway I use Warren or Art auxiliaries, or a  Burstone butterfly so I don't really need Ormco TMA. ( Or I  sometimes torque the anteriors with a 22 X 28 Sentalloy wire with great results).
- Finishing bends or torquing a single tooth : I find Ormco TMA much more efficient than others. I didn't try Cerum CNA, but Dr Nanda, which I deeply respect for his competence and honesty, told me that CNA was clinicaly as good as Ormco TMA.

I hope this will help and I 'm waiting for other comments ! Best regards to all !

Jérôme Wanono, DDS, Msc Ortho. 
Montreal University, Qc, Canada.
Montmorency, FRANCE


Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 12:18:44 EDT
Subject: Extraction of E's when missing 5's...

I read an article that said removing the deciduous molars to allow for space closure when the adult second bicuspids are missing is much more successful if they are removed by a young age.  I don't remember what that age was and I am unable to find the article.  What is the consensus on removing deciduous molars early in these cases?  I have a 7y.o. male patient missing all second bicuspids.  He would not be a good extraction case and if he were older, I would plan to implant the bicuspids (and maybe I still should).  I am thinking that he is young enough to treat him without implants.  Worst case scenario would be that I have to open some space back up again for implants.  Any thoughts?

Greg Scott


Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 07:48:37 -0300
From: "Dr. Lee Erickson" <>
Subject: Management and imaging software
To: "Ortho study club" <ESCO@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU>

I too was on Orthotrac Classic for many years and found the Unix platform to be bulletproof. I switched to the Windows version and Imaging about 5 years ago. I run chairside charting, check-in, Televox, a digital pan/ceph, etc. off of Windows XP. So far the only issues we have had is that the servers have had to be upgraded twice with additional memory. Orthotrac service is pretty good but very expensive.

Lee Erickson


From: " John Mamutil " < >
Subject: Re: Digital SLR Camera Settings
Date: Sunday, June 05, 2005 1:28 AM

True TTL Flash metering seems to be only available on certain SLR cameras. I use both the Nikon D100 and Fuji S1 (supposedly the "SAME" engine/body) cameras. I picked up a TTL module from CLINIPIX (561-793-4142) at the AAO meeting in Orlando last year. This module lets GENERIC ring flash units to operate in TTL mode only on the FUJI S1 and S2 cameras. No one can tell me why it won't work with my NIKON D100.

So now the FUJI S1 is the preferred Clinical camera. The flash - thanks to TTL - recharges in next to no time and every shot is perfect. I still use f38 for intra-oral shots - so regarding the question on over-exposed images - just increase the f-stop. Again with TTL - I could probably take all my pictures at the one f stop - say about f27.

John Mamutil, Orthodontist



Subject: JCO May 2005
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 12:02:19 -0600
From: "Wendy Osterman" <>

JCO May 2005 issue.
Open the attached PDF for the current Journal of Clinical Orthodontics table of contents. The Editor's Corner ("A Farewell to Two Orthodontic Giants") and other articles are accessible at .

JCO Staff
Journal of Clinical Orthodontics

(Please see attached PDF file)



Dear Colleague:

The Electronic Study Club for Orthodontics (ESCO) is a free forum for exchange of information and opinions among orthodontists, and for distribution of professional information, sponsored by the Department of Orthodontics, University of Illinois at Chicago .  Information distributed on this list-server is NOT edited or refereed, and it represents only the opinions of the writers of the individual messages. Such writers bear the sole responsibility for the content of messages they author.  Authors are required to verify information regarding other parties included in their messages.  

* What information can you get on ESCO?

* How to subscribe to ESCO?

* How to change your address?

* How to post messages on ESCO?

* How to get copies of old digests of ESCO?

For answers to these questions and more, please check our web site:

To view and search old digests, please view our web site:

Enjoy your reading!