| Date: | Tuesday, May 08, 2007 11:16 PM |
| From: | "ESCO automatic digest system" <LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU> |
| Subject: | ESCO Digest - 7 May 2007 to 8 May 2007 (#2007-46) |
| To: | ESCO@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU |
There are 2 messages totalling 191 lines in this issue.
Topics of the day:
1. Damon bond failure
2. Orthocad IQ
| Date: | Saturday, May 08, 2007 10:14 PM |
| From: | BENKOVICHJ@AOL.COM <BENKOVICHJ@AOL.COM> |
| Subject: | Damon bond failure |
My experience with Damon has been disappointing at best. The bond failures at first were tremendous with the D3 (hybrid) and have been a bit better with the MX. Now that the bond failure is "better" I have a new problem...I am not able to finish cases as easily and it is taking more time. Not with every case but, even with differential torques selected to offset class 2 & 3 mechanics there is still more difficulty in finishing than when I was using ORTHOS. There is just too much slop built into the Damon system. WHY DID I LEAVE ORTHOS?
John Benkovich
| Date: | Saturday, May 08, 2007 3:05 PM |
| From: | BENKOVICHJ@AOL.COM <BENKOVICHJ@AOL.COM> |
| Subject: | Orthocad IQ |
ESCO,
I too would like to ask if there is a good reason for or against the Orthocad IQ? I am about to go through the training and would like to be certain this product/service is worth trying. Testimonials?
John Benkovich