|Date:||Tuesday, May 08, 2007 11:16 PM|
|From:||"ESCO automatic digest system" <LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU>|
|Subject:||ESCO Digest - 7 May 2007 to 8 May 2007 (#2007-46)|
There are 2 messages totalling 191 lines in this issue.
Topics of the day:
1. Damon bond failure
2. Orthocad IQ
|Date:||Saturday, May 08, 2007 10:14 PM|
|Subject:||Damon bond failure|
My experience with Damon has been disappointing at best. The bond failures at first were tremendous with the D3 (hybrid) and have been a bit better with the MX. Now that the bond failure is "better" I have a new problem...I am not able to finish cases as easily and it is taking more time. Not with every case but, even with differential torques selected to offset class 2 & 3 mechanics there is still more difficulty in finishing than when I was using ORTHOS. There is just too much slop built into the Damon system. WHY DID I LEAVE ORTHOS?
|Date:||Saturday, May 08, 2007 3:05 PM|
I too would like to ask if there is a good reason for or against the Orthocad IQ? I am about to go through the training and would like to be certain this product/service is worth trying. Testimonials?