Date: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 11:16 PM
From: "ESCO automatic digest system" <LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU>
Subject: ESCO Digest - 7 May 2007 to 8 May 2007 (#2007-46)
To: ESCO@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU

There are 2 messages totalling 191 lines in this issue.

Topics of the day:

  1. Damon bond failure
  2. Orthocad IQ


Date: Saturday, May 08, 2007 10:14 PM
From: BENKOVICHJ@AOL.COM <BENKOVICHJ@AOL.COM>
Subject: Damon bond failure

My experience with Damon has been disappointing at best.  The bond failures at first were tremendous with the D3 (hybrid) and have been a bit better with the MX.  Now that the bond failure is "better" I have a new problem...I am not able to finish cases as easily and it is taking more time.  Not with every case but, even with differential torques selected to offset class 2 & 3  mechanics there is still more difficulty in finishing than when I was using ORTHOS. There is just too much slop built into the Damon system. WHY DID I LEAVE ORTHOS?

John Benkovich

 

Date: Saturday, May 08, 2007 3:05 PM
From: BENKOVICHJ@AOL.COM <BENKOVICHJ@AOL.COM>
Subject: Orthocad IQ

ESCO,

I too would like to ask if there is a good reason for or against the Orthocad IQ?  I am about to go through the training and would like to be certain this product/service is worth trying. Testimonials?

John Benkovich