ADVISING
AS TEACHING
Norma E. Wagoner, Ph. D., Dean of Students University of Chicago Pritzker School
of Medicine
Text of presentation at the University of Illinois College of Medicine at the
Academy for Excellence in Teaching on April 18, 2001
Why is that that you should
consider yourself a teacher in your role as an advisor; why should your interactions
with your students be viewed as a form of teaching? This is the challenge that
Dean Hammett has asked me to take on in my discussion with you today.
The literature states that advising is an extension of teaching outside
the classroom and, as such, is the key element in student retention, satisfaction
and progress to degree. Let's look at the role of the teacher and for a minute
think about the most salient aspects of the job. I believe that a teacher's
interest and encouragement plays a crucial role in motivating students to reach
beyond self-imposed limits.
Participating in the give
and take of a learning experience under the guidance of a knowledgeable teacher
is central to helping students understand an educational and career path that
often appears littered with potholes and imminent danger. A sage advisor can
help smooth that terrain a bit by pointing out guideposts along the way. Whether
you teach your students using skills you acquired in professional development
seminars, or through self-education, experience and honed judgment, this knowledge
has undoubtedly proven highly beneficial. However, what students will most remember
is your attitude toward them and toward the issues they bring to the table for
discussion. In my experience of 30 years teaching and advising, I fully believe
that what each student typically seeks in his or her interactions with an advisor
is the opportunity for personal discovery. In a meandering conversation, full
of intriguing tangents and autobiographical asides, the pitfalls of going nowhere
during an advisory session certainly exist. However, if you always keep in mind
that you and each student hold a common educational goal and that with sustained
interaction, the goal can and will be reached. This is the heart of any teaching
experience. Through this one-on-one interaction, you offer students the best
opportunity to more fully explore their gifts, as well as guidance toward overcoming
weaknesses that might hamper them. Teaching through your advisory capacity in
this way induces students to demand more of themselves, leads them to new ways
of solving problems, and awakens unsuspected talents.
I recently came across a statement that speaks volumes to me in my capacity
as a teacher. "Teaching is like dropping ideas into the letter box of the human
subconscious. You know when they are posted, but you never know when they will
be received or in what form." Offering sound advice based upon personal educational
goals and values can be a powerful force for students as they traverse through
medical school. I believe that the job of advising is one of the singular most
important functions that we perform in our medical centers in terms of producing
competent, caring and productive physicians.
I am sure you have all had the experience of making what seemed to you a remarkably
simple suggestion to a student during an advising session, then later you found
out that this statement had a profound effect on the student. A thoughtful exchange
of ideas and possibilities may serve as a seed to your student in generating
new ideas, opening new avenues of exploration, gaining insights into his or
her value system, garnering courage to dare or to change. If you have an opportunity
to speak with graduates who have gained a few years experience in practice,
ask them who or what they remember most from their tenure in medical school.
I can bet that it won't be how great such and such a class was, but that it
will be a person or persons who cared about them, helped them grow and change
to become who they are today.
In preparation for this presentation, I came across a quote in a book entitled
Universal Higher Education, and I thought to myself, this same statement could
just as easily apply to our teaching goals for medical students. "The critical
component of education attempts to expose students to multiple and conflicting
perspectives on themselves and their society in order to test and challenge
their previously unexamined assumptions. It strives to create conditions, that
stimulate students intellectual, moral, and emotional growth so that they may
ground their skills in a more mature, humane framework of values. Critical education
deliberately tries to stimulate the student to re-formulate his goals, his cognitive
map of the world, the way he thinks, and his view of his role in society." This
statement resonates with my belief in that it serves to challenge each of us,
whether faculty member or student, to move from an easier route of complacency
to one of action.
Taking action provides
its own set of basic challenges. The world of academic medicine for today s
basic scientists and physicians has taken unprecedented leaps in terms of complexity
and individual demands. And those of you who have worked with young medical
students over a period of years also realize that today s student population
has changed tremendously. For nearly two decades, we have been enrolling an
ever-increasing number of students from diverse cultural, ethnic and educational
backgrounds, and from a wider range of ages and a gender distribution more representative
of society. You have also probably noticed a vast difference in students societal
values and beliefs. From my vantage point, counseling students 20 years ago
was much easier than it is today. Should this fact dissuade faculty from putting
forth their utmost effort to offer wise counsel and advice? I hope not.
Rather, we must impress upon our students that in order to achieve the greatest
gain, they should enter the advisory relationship with a questioning attitude,
a desire to learn, and the courage to understand their own values and goals.
And that if they have this dedication, we will be in a position to give them
our best guidance toward overcoming obstacles and setting goals for their professional
lives. I would encourage you at the end of any advising session to ask your
student, "Now that we have had this conversation, what do you see as your job
until we meet again?" The engaged student stands to benefit by learning new
modes of thinking and new ways of solving problems that extend beyond the advisory
sessions.
I am sure you have all heard it said that teaching is an art and not a science,
yet every artist needs a grounding in technique before setting to work, and
no artist or teacher in the world can afford to lose an opportunity to improve
her skills. In the advising roles that you have been asked to assume, I would
like to spend the remainder of the time talking briefly about those that are
delineated in the 2001 Faculty Advisor Handbook. I'll touch upon some
of the skills needed and the subtleties that can impede your transmission of
these skills to students.
Professional Role Modeling
The first category, professional role modeling, offers the following description:
"Clinical and basic science faculty provide students a glimpse into their profession,
and can offer both inspiration and clarification about the choice of a professional
life in a discipline."
On the surface, this sounds straightforward and simple. Of course most advisors
would like to be viewed as good professional role models, and each of us would
hope at times to inspire our students. Providing "a glimpse into their profession,"
however, may prove daunting. Understanding the role of the physician in today's
changing field of medicine is a Herculean task, let alone attempting to speculate
upon the future of medicine. The transformation that is occurring in medicine
has in many respects, shaped the medical schools curriculum. For the student,
there is more of everything to learn, a much expanded range of possibilities
for career options in both science and medicine, and the role that medical informatics
is and will play in the future has only begun to be foretold. You may think
that to succeed in informing your students about changes in medicine and science,
you not only need huge amounts of information, but a crystal ball. Yes, you
do need to keep abreast of changes, but even more importantly, you must maintain
a positive outlook regarding these changes. I can assure you that most students
focus on the attitude that an advisor or teacher conveys toward change. And
right after that, they will be listening for the degree of optimism with which
you express your thoughts about their futures. From this perspective,
you can encourage students to explore opportunities on all of the various levels
these changes create to utilize their MD degrees in finding the right career
niche.
In truth, there is nothing more crucial to the renewal of the profession of
medicine than the effectiveness and capacity, the quality and vitality of the
human beings flowing into the system. These young people will venture forth
and replace current physicians. They will create the future. Given that reality,
the task that falls to us as advisors and teachers cannot be overstated. We
can aid our students by removing as many impediments as possible to their professional
development, and we can assist each one of them to grow to full stature, instilled
with the inherent value of the profession.
If you asked a medical student, What do you look for in a role model? what do
you suppose she would say? Although the response may differ depending on the
age, gender and background of the individual, I have found that most students
will name the same character traits: honesty, respect, caring, compassion, sensitivity
and the ability to listen. An important subtlety in the question of what constitutes
a good role model lies in the societal values that students identify
as important. What do I mean by this?
In the early 80 s considerable research was done that indicated a shift in our
societal value system in the United States, and how this shift would shape our
society in this new millennium. After two hundred years, the Christian work
ethic, delayed gratification and unremitting toil model began to move aside
to be replaced by greater emphasis on expanding personal choices of lifestyle
by greater tolerance and less emphasis on sacrifice for its own sake. In other
words, the self-denial ethic that once ruled American life was being replaced
by an ethic that encompassed self-gratification first and foremost. While this
new value system has introduced its challenges in teaching and advising, students
feel that it provides them a world of possibilities. The downside of this is
that with this panoply of options, it makes it much more difficult to choose,
because the perception is that landing on one option now forecloses other choices.
Part of the complicated nature of all this is that students have set the goal
of achieving well in their careers, while at the same time having quality relationships
with family and friends. This noble goal of having it all is admirable, but
observing students trying to make this work is part of challenge that comes
to us as teachers and advisors.
Now those of us who grew up under the Christian work ethic may be quick to criticize
this generation s value system. However, I think we have to admit that in many
respects it is healthier to be less constrained by choices and to have time
for family and friends. But the idea that they can have it all has and is creating
enormous conflicts for students. Many come to medical school with a certain
mind-set that they can balance a career and personal life without the kind of
sacrifice made by the previous generation. In my experience, students suffer
serious ambiguity today as they search for that perfect specialty that will
allow them to do it all. We are only now coming into a time when the effects
of these changes in values are being expressed at the residency level. We have
almost no data from the residency side to ascertain how programs are coping
with the values that students bring and its impact on choices they are making.
What we hear from program directors is that our graduates appear much more stressed,
and that they have had to find ways to alter programs to help residents cope.
Is this bad? I don t think so. Is it a big change? I think we would all have
to echo a resounding yes. So what should our role as teachers and advisors be
as students seek to make this all work? While telling them what you did in your
life and how you have found balance may help, then again it may not.
Student Advocacy
Moving on to student advocacy, the opening sentence under this role responsibility
from your advisor handbook states, "Faculty serve as the first line of defense
in assisting students to navigate the College of Medicine curriculum." This
translates into a tall order and a challenging goal for the serious minded advisor.
In my estimation, we cannot afford to simply provide passive allegiance to students.
Young people entering our medical schools now do so at a time when the values
underpinning their professional development have become rather hazy and less
clearly articulated. As medical educators, we fully realize that the medical
school environment serves in many ways as an incubator of professionalism, but
rarely do we examine it. Fred Hafferty made this statement in his article in
1998 entitled, "Beyond Curriculum Reform: Confronting Medicine s Hidden Curriculum."
As you get feedback from students about their experiences in medical school,
I am certain that you hear their own struggles in trying to determine what it
means to become a professional. Sprinkled among their comments you likely heard
them relate particular examples of less than professional behavior that they
witnessed or were subjected to. Student mistreatment has become a topic of much
discussion in medical schools, along with ethical issues that arise in both
pre-clerkship and clerkship years. Appropriate advocacy on the part of a trusting
faculty member relevant to personal development can be tremendously beneficial
to a student during this time of transition.
The core value system emphasizing service and quality care for patients as a
central focus in discussions by our academic leaders has been sorely challenged
during the 1990 s as health care reform has unfolded. Many would claim that
a significant distortion of the original mission of the teaching hospital has
occurred, not that there is less emphasis on the importance of service and quality
care for the patients, but the time for faculty in emphasizing these important
elements has been eroded. Attend any clinical chairmen s meeting and you will
most certainly witness an intense concentration on the business aspects of the
medical school and its role as a profit center, almost to the exclusion of other
issues. As far as discussions about the education of medical students in the
hospitals, you would be unlikely to hear a great deal.
In society, when people are torn loose from the context of community and shared
values and the framework appears to disintegrate, individuals often experience
it as a loss of meaning and a sense of powerlessness sets in. I would also contend
that an inward focus develops and the focus on self-interest prevails. While
we all value individuality, self-reliance, self-discipline and self-help, it
becomes all the more critical that faculty rise above the chaos in our academic
medical centers and lend clarity to their voices. It is you who will likely
understand what is happening and why a student might be confused and exhibiting
a sense of not belonging in this profession. It is you who can help the student
maintain some degree of altruism. Students entered their medical school with
great expectations of their faculty and advisors, and they need your help in
finding others who believe in them and who want to see them achieve the highest
level of professionalism.
For you as faculty, student advocacy does not come without a price. At times,
it can be extremely difficult to ferret out a student s real issues among the
many questions and concerns they relate to you. After 30 years as a faculty
member, and 28 of those as a dean, I have found that my greatest reward has
been in coming to know students in the truest sense. This is what really matters
to them and to me. As educators, most of us understand that helping students
realize their full potential is and must always be central to the student-advisor
relationship.
Personal Counseling
Your workbook further states: "Faculty are critical in identifying student needs
and providing the feedback and support necessary for academic success." This
essential component in the role of an advisor can be the most trying directive
in attempting to execute it well. For all medical students, success in the academic
realm overshadows all other developmental aspects of professionalism. Without
evidence of competence, the student has the potential to be dismissed. Figuring
out how students learn and providing the appropriate help to overcome difficulties
serves as a primary focus in these interactions. If a student relates to you
that she has difficulties with standardized examinations, how can you best help
her to overcome this significant obstacle? Another even more problematic situation
involves a student who describes himself as a "slow reader," because English
is his second language. Aware that this does not qualify as a learning disability,
he asks you for help in dealing with this problem. What would you do? Then there
s the student who tells you that she prefers to do her academic work alone,
and doesn t need to be part of a study group -- yet she's failing? How do you
convince this student that learning from and with others will prove to be a
critical skill in the profession she has chosen?
When a student acknowledges that he has an academic problem and needs to take
some kind of action, it becomes imperative for an advisor to listen and to detract
the student from believing the worst about his situation, which is what most
students tend to do. As an advisor, you must first provide an environment conducive
to a meaningful exchange, and then serve as a confidant. If, in your capacity
as an advisor, you have full awareness of your own instructional and interpersonal
strengths, you will be able to easily determine whether you can help a student
directly or whether triaging the student to another source might be necessary.
In either case, you have provided evidence to the student of your caring and
commitment. A key factor in your commitment to students is accessibility making
yourself time available to deal with student problems as they arise, rather
than attempting to fit them into a rigid schedule. Teaching professionalism
and broadening the students knowledge as to methods of coping and instilling
strategies for dealing with stress will give them a solid basis for problem
solving. Other critical components in personal counseling involve demonstrating
responsiveness to the degree of a student's understanding of an issue, fostering
responsibility, treating each student impartially, respecting divergent views
and enhancing self-esteem.
Career Guidance
The handbook states that "all faculty can assist students in the process of
self-assessment and clarification of personal goals which are essential to good
career planning." Twenty years ago, this aspect of advising provoked little
anxiety among either students or faculty. Students selection of a specialty
flowed logically out of their curriculum sequence. Because the residency selection
process was not as high powered and high-pressured as it is today, the student
stress level was markedly lower. Then a series of events occurred: the balance
of positions and candidates began to shift, students choices of specialties
started to change, fill rates of residency programs on match day approached
99%, leaving few or no choices for those students who failed to engage in the
process correctly. Consequently, career advising shifted from being centered
in the third year, to beginning in earnest with entrance into medical school.
Many medical educators feel that much of the residency selection process is
out of control, that politics play too large a part, and that Dean s Letters
need a major overhaul in order to increase their usefulness.
Coupled with changes at the residency level, students have migrated to the so-called
"lifestyle" specialties in droves in the last few years. Many of these specialties,
such as dermatology, have only one or two positions in each of the programs,
thus forcing students to apply to some 30-50 programs. If a student goes on
20 interviews, this may seem like a lot. Considering that this is probably fewer
than 40 positions nationwide that the student is vying for, it represents a
major gamble to achieving this career path. If this is your student and his
academic record raises questions as to whether he is strong enough to qualify
for one of these highly competitive specialties (i.e. if his USMLE Step I score
falls below 210), you might ask, "So, what would you like to choose as a back-up
specialty?" If the second or third choices are other so-called lifestyle options,
such as radiology or radiation oncology, you know you re in trouble with counseling
this student, since these are now among the most competitive specialty choices
today. Of course many of these specialties require a transitional year, which
is becoming very competitive as well. Indicating to the student that he should
list a transitional at the end of his primary list of the advanced specialties
and apply again during the PGY 1 year is not really a viable option for becoming
the specialist that he hopes to be. For the first time this year, I experienced
students being turned away for interviews from transitional programs because
their board scores were not high enough. So if you are counseling a good, solid
student, there is a likelihood that you could be advising this student to apply
to 60 or more programs, with the hope of interviews in 25 or so of the advanced
and transitional year programs combined. It is not difficult to fast-forward
to the expenditures by the student in the thousands of dollars bracket, and
one can only hope that the final outcome is what is desired.
The time investment for the residency selection process not only complicates
the medical education of the student, but the advisor system as well. During
the interview frenzy from November to February, you had hopes that your student
might spend time self-reflecting and analyzing his strengths and weaknesses
in order to better understand his values and beliefs, develop affirmation for
commitment to his specialty choice through this self-knowledge and to leave
the school well informed about his greatest personal strengths. You had also
hoped to invest more time in talking about what might constitute a balanced
life and to help him develop a realistic perspective on what might lie ahead.
You feel very challenged in doing the best job given the circumstances that
have evolved over time. Are there any ready solutions on the horizon? I haven't
seen them, but creative efforts will need to be expended in finding ways to
relate to your students.
Being an advisor is serious business. To do it well takes time time to keep
abreast of changes in the medical field, to attend workshops or other educational
venues, and to gain knowledge and skills through every possible means. Most
importantly, it takes time to learn to know every student you teach. And remember,
attitude is everything; maintaining optimism and perceiving career possibilities
for every student in a field that he or she wishes to consider may prove your
greatest challenge. As I have said before, successfully guiding, motivating
and shaping young professionals requires a strong desire to make a difference
in the young lives of medical students.
That's it then, that's all it takes: dedication, time, and optimism and you
will attain great success as a teacher and advisor. I wish you the very best.