MANAGED CARE NEWS online
December 2000
Volume 2 Issue 2
"Our job here is done. Now let’s clear the hall. Let’s vote and then dash away, dash away all."
Representative C.W. Bill Young, (R-Fla.)
Chairman, House Appropriations Committee
December 15, 2000
More than two months behind schedule, the curtain fell on the 106th Congress after lawmakers approved a final budget package that includes major increases in education spending and expanded Medicare payments for health providers. Both sides immediately claimed victories after months of protracted negotiations, which reached an impasse before the November 7th election and dragged on for a month because of the uncertainty surrounding the White House contest.
The end of the lame duck session closed the book on a Congress that began with Clinton’s impeachment trial, deadlocked for months over everything from campaign finance reform to a Medicare prescription drug benefit and finally weathered an election that left the institution as politically divided as ever. Pre-election partisan crossfire downed new health maintenance organization regulations in a patient rights bill and efforts to achieve long-term solvency for Medicare and Social Security never really got off the ground.
Working up to the last minute on the final details of the package, the omnibus budget bill passed as the last item of business as many members of Congress were leaving the Capitol. Symbolic of the bickering that often characterized this Congress, the final votes were delayed for hours because of a dispute over environmental issues concerning Pollock fishing and Steller sea lions.
The final version of the budget bill included more than $35 billion for Medicare and Medicaid related items to ease the impact of payment cuts mandated by the 1997 Balanced Budget Act. Hospitals are expected to receive about $14 billion of the total, insurance companies about $12 billion, and the rest will go to home health agencies, skilled nursing facilities and other providers.
The budget package also included additional funds for the National Institutes of Health to pay for medical research and clinical trials, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. As with any budget bill, this one also became a magnet for millions of dollars worth of "pork" projects for congressional members. My favorites included $1.5 million for sunflower research and $176,000 for the Reindeer Herders Association – a truly seasonal touch….
The Editor
University of Illinois at Chicago Physician Group (UICPG)
Revises Referral Policy
To streamline administrative procedures, the UICPG has revised its referral policy. Effective immediately, referral forms should be completed only when you are referring an eligible member outside of the University. The UICPG Medical Director must approve these referrals. Completion of referral forms to another UICPG physician will no longer be needed. This policy is effective immediately and applies to all eligible members who have selected a UICPG as their Primary Care Physician (PCP) and UICPG is responsible for payment of these services. These members belong to the following financial classes:
Financial Class HMO Name
J02 HMO-Illinois-UIC site 141
J21 UIHMO Alumni-UIC
J35 UIHMO CampusCare-UIC
JAI Humana IPA Model-UIC
JAK Humana Premier HMO-UIC
JC6 UniCare-UIC
For members belonging to any other health plan or financial class, you must follow the required referral process of the individual health plan. Questions about this policy and procedural change should be directed to the UICPG Provider Service Representative, Barbara Rabin, at brabin@uic.edu.
Please Note: Only UIHMO (J21 & J35) and HMO-I (J02) permit mental health referrals to the UIC Department of Psychiatry. UIHMO (J21 & J35) is the only plan that permits substance abuse referrals to the UIC Department of Psychiatry.
Beech Street Network Directory
Beech Street Corporation has acknowledged that they have erroneously added the UIC Physician Group in their PPO directory without our permission. Because of this, some Beech Street members have sought out medical attention from our physicians with the understanding that these providers were part of Beech Street’s network. This has also caused Beech Street to apply their in-network rates to our claims.
If you find that a discount has been inappropriately taken on a claim, forward that information to Therese Flanagan at Beech Street so the payment can be rectified. Her address is listed below.
Therese Flanagan, Network Development
Beech Street Corporation
Two TransAm Plaza Drive
Suite #400
Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181
Questions about this issue may be directed to Vince Savackis at savin@uic.edu.
New Rules Issued on Health Appeals
Millions of Americans in employer-based health plans can demand speedier decisions on their health claims and will have more time to appeal rejected coverage under new rules issued by the Labor Department at the end of November.
More than two years in the making, the new regulations, due to take effect in January 2002, are meant to streamline significantly the claims process for persons covered by employer-sponsored health plans, which are governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and generally outside the influence of most other federal regulation.
Under these new regulations, health plans will be required to make coverage decisions within 72 hours for urgent requests, 15 days for preauthorization decisions, and 30 days for services already provided. In addition, plans must notify patients about their claims within 45 days and render decisions within 60 days on appeals of denied claims. Plans currently have up to 90 days to process an initial claim and 60 days to rule on an appeal. Patients will be able to sue health plans if these requirements are not followed.
Patient rights advocated hailed the new rules as long overdue while the American Association of Health Plans and the Health Insurance Association of American reacted by saying that the new rules will lead to increased health costs and unnecessary litigation.
The new regulations will apply to about 130 million employees in the private sectors who receive their health insurance under employer-funded plans.
Rise Predicted in Health Benefit Costs
The cost of employer-sponsored health insurance benefits are expected to rise 11 percent next year and many employers say they will pass on more of the expense to workers, according to a newly released survey by William M. Mercer Inc., a New York-based consulting firm.
This escalation comes on top of health insurance costs that increased 8 percent nationally during the past year. The findings confirmed what many employers and other industry analysts have known: Health insurance costs have been rising steadily over the past three years, largely due to the increased use and cost of prescription drugs.
New Medical Privacy Regulations Released
Whatsoever things I see or hear concerning the life of men, in my attentance on the sick or even apart therefrom, which ought not be noised abroad, I will keep silence thereon, counting such things to be as sacred secrets.
Oath of Hippocrates,
4th Century, B.C.E.
In concert with other federal agencies, the Department of Health and Human Services has issued a new set of proposed federal regulations designed to protect the privacy of medical records. The new regulations require health plans and doctors to inform patients how their information is being used and to whom it is being disclosed, and also gives each patient a right to a "disclosure history" – a list of entities that received their personal medical information.
Scheduled to take effect in two years, doctors and hospitals will be required to obtain written consent before using a patients’ health information, even for routine purposes. Patients will also have the right to access their medical files, as well as the right to request amendments or corrections. Under the final rules, protections will be extended to personal medical records in all forms, whether communicated electronically, on paper, or orally.
The rules also create new civil and criminal penalties for improper use or disclose of personal health information – up to $50,000 and one year in jail for obtaining or disclosing protected health information and up to $250,000 and 10 years in jail for obtaining or disclosing protected information with the intent to sell, transfer or use it for commercial advantage, personal gain or malicious harm.
The rules were issued by the Department of Health and Human Services after Congress failed in its three-year effort to craft national privacy standards as required by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.
As soon as they were released, health care advocates, leaders and analysts expressed concern over cost, compliance, and gaps in the regulations suggesting that the five-year battle over personal privacy is far from over. Clinton officials acknowledged that the new Bush administration could delay or revise the privacy rules but felt it may be difficult to do at this point given the broad public support for this type of regulation.
If you are interested in more detail, the Department of Health and Human Services has provided a summary fact sheet at www.hhs.gov/news/press/2000pres/00fsprivacy.html .
Announcement From the Managed Care Department
The department wishes every success to Janet Namini, who will leave on January 1st to become Director of Physician Practice for the Department of Surgical Oncology here at the medical center. Janet has been involved in business development efforts for almost two years and we will miss her hard work and commitment.
As a member of our contract development team, Janet worked with representatives from many departments to build business here at UICMC. Her efforts and enthusiasm will be hard to replace. Good luck to you, Janet!
The Editor