GEM-SET : Girls' E-Mentoring Program : Science | Engineering | Technology
Home
Welcome
Mentors
Partners
Calendar of Events
Daily Digest
Contacts
SET Links
FAQs
Daily Digest Archive

Daily Digest Archive for Augsut 14, 2002

Q: (Initially posted on 8/13) FROM KEVA M. IN MA
How would you compare the salaries of minority women in
technology careers today with their salaries 5 or 10
years ago?

August 14, 2002
A: FROM MENTOR KRISTIN TAGHON, TO READ BIO., CLICK HERE.
Keva, I did an extensive search for information on minority women in the
sciences. I came up with alot of information on women in the sciences and
minorities in the sciences, but very little on minority women in the sciences.
I thought that perhaps, if I combined the two, you could get a sense of minority
women. After doing the research, though, I find some conflicting information.
Some articles show that salary gaps between men and women are closing and are
now more indicative of education. Another shows that minority women are perhaps
doing better than non-minority women in obtaining doctorates. I could not find
any information on salaries of minority women and how more educated minority
women might affect salary, or even if it does. Additionally, it is very hard to
find studies based on data as recent as 2000, 2001 or 2002. It must take a long
while to compile the data and glean anything from the data. I hope you find
this interesting. Hopefully, someone else will find more on salary. Read on.


In an article "1997 Salary Survey", the salaries of Medical Device Professionals
are compared to previous years. I felt that this profession could represent the
science and technology industry in part. The article states that


"Gender is not included in the worksheet this year, suggesting that it does not
weigh as heavily as other factors. There is still a disparity between the
average salaries of men and women--$72,700 for men, $55,400 for women--but
factors such as education, experience, and primary job function may determine
salary more than gender does.


Similar to survey results of 1994 and 1995, region plays a key role in
predicting salary. This year, users of the survey worksheet must deduct a hefty
$5930 if they work in the southern United States; their average salary is $7200
less than the industry average. "


In short, this article states that, salary disparities between men and women,
even in 1997, were beginning to be based more on education and experience, than
gender. Given this, more women need to get the education to catch up with men
in salary and position. This article includes data about women and minorities.
http://www.devicelink.com/mddi/archive/97/08/016.html


The following article tends to show information differently and is based on data
from 1993, although, it is copyrighted in 2000. This article shows the progress
of Affirmative Action (AA) and how it has opened workplace doors and brought
better salaries for women of all colors. AA has helped to acquire greater job
stability and occupational ambition to women and minoriites. But, there is
still a gap in salary for women of equal experience and education.
http://www.feminist.org/other/ccri/aafact2.html


In yet, another article I found on www.feminist.org, about women in
sports-related careers.:
http://www.feminist.org/sports/wsf_feature.asp
they quote
" This report revealed that a full-time, female communications manager earned 86
cents for every dollar a man made in her industry in 1995. In 2000, she made
only 73 cents on the man’s dollar (Washington Post, January 2002). Although this
study prompts more questions for explanation than causal conclusions, it does
send a clear indication that America is not guaranteed unimpeded progress
towards economic equality absent concerted cooperative efforts.". But this
article represents all women, not just minority women.

From the Commission on Professionals in Science & Technology, in an article
about minorities obtaining degrees, "Under-represented Minorities in
Engineering, A Progress Report" by Elanor L. Babco, Executive Directorof the
Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology, studies of populations in
S&E education.
http://www.cpst.org/Minorities.pdf
It was reported that:
"While there was an increase in the number of Hispanic graduates of slighly more
than 1%, at the two producing institutions of Hispanic graduates, the University
of Puerto Rico and Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico, there was a decline
from 1999 to 2000. In addition, at California Polytechnic University at San
Luis Obispo, there was a drop of over 30% of Hispanics baccalaureates, mostly
women. In 2000, no Hispanic women engineering graduates were reported -
compared to 8 women Hispanic grads in 1999."

"For African Americans, there was a drop of 16% of baccalaureates from 1999 -
2000 at the top producer - North Carolina AT&T (from 223 to 187) and most of the
drop is comprised of African American men. There was a decline of only one
African American woman at NC AT&T."

"It is interesting to note that underrepresented minority women earn a higher
proportion of the engineering doctorates granted in their racial/ethnic group
than do the white non-Hispanic women or the Asian women. In 1980, black,
non-Hispanic women earned 11.1% of the doctorates earned by black, non-Hispanics
in engineering; by 1999, they had increased their share to 24%. Hispanic women
earned 3.7% of the engineering PhDs granted to Hispanics in 19809; by 1999,
they earned 28% while Native American women earned none of the three doctorates
awared in engineering in 1980. But earned 2 of the 12 of the PhDs in 1999. In
comparison white non-Hispanic women earned 5.1% of the engineering doctorates
awarded to whites in 1980 and 16.7% of the PhDs in 1999. Asian women earned
2.5% in 1980 and 16.9% in 1999. "

In a collection of articles from Commission on Professionals in Science &
Technology,
http://www.cpst.org/S&E.pdf
"Scientists and Engineers for the New Millennium: Renewing the Human Resource;
A collection of the Commissionon Professionals in Science and Technology" Babco
and Marry Golladay collaborate and state:

"Women have increased their percent of earned degrees in Science and Engineering
fields at all levels since 1970, rising from 28% of S&E degrees to over 48% in
1997 at the bachelor's level. Their proportion has increased more dramatically
at the doctorate level, where the proportion of degrees to women in S&E fields
rose from 9% in 1970 to nearly 33% in 1997. Increases at the master's level
have been intermediate between the bachelor's and doctorate degree levels."
"Increases in the proportion of S&E degrees to underrepresented minorities have
been at best gradual over the past 10 years. This group earned under 10% of S&E
bachelor's degrees to US citizens and permanent residents in 1989 and increased
that percentage to just under 15% of the S&E degrees awarded to US citizens and
permanent residents in 1989, and increased that percentage to only 7% in 1997."
"THe proportion of all S&E doctorates awarded to underrepresented minorities is
even smaller when considered as part of the total group of doctorates. The
proportion of doctorate degree awards to foreign citizens is highest at the
doctorate level. U.S. citizens earned 67% of the S&E degrees fromUS
universities in 1980 as well as 1997."

Another article in this collection by Mary Frank Fox discusses what we know
about Education And Employment for women in science and how this affects the
field in the future. Her findings showed that women getting their degrees
approach the degrees in a different way than men do. She states that

"Women are less likely to report that they are taken seriously by faculty, and
that they are respected by faculty. Despite strong preferences for
collaboration by both men and women students, women report collaborating with
fewer graduate students and fewer male faculty. Women are more likely than men
to view their relationship with their advisor as one of 'student-and-faculty'
rather than 'mentee-mentor' or colleagues, suggesting greater social distance
for women. In outcomes, women students published fewer papers than men in a
prior three-year period, and are less likely to report that they will, indeed
receive their degrees."

END