GEM-SET : Girls' E-Mentoring Program : Science | Engineering | Technology
Home
Welcome
Mentors
Partners
Calendar of Events
Daily Digest
Contacts
SET Links
FAQs
Daily Digest Archive

Daily Digest Archive for September 13, 2002

Q: (Initially posted on 9/9) FROM MENTEE LORRA IN KY
Is there a such thing as a college for science?

 

September 13, 2002
A: FROM MENTOR SUZANNE FRANKS. FOR BIO. CLICK HERE.
There are indeed colleges that focus on the sciences and/or
on engineering. MIT, Cal-Tech, Stevens Institute of Technology, and
Rochester Polytechnic University. I also just recently learned about
the University of the Sciences in Philadelphia http://www.usip.edu/
which looks kind of interesting. This university focuses on
preparing students for professions in the health sciences and
natural sciences. Also, Unity College, in Maine www.unity.edu
is known as "America's Environmental College" and they focus
intensively on environmental sciences. There are likely to be
many more such colleges that I am not aware of. I know
a mentor in an earlier answer encouraged you not to limit yourself
to a school that focuses exclusively on science, but sometimes
when you are really really interested in a particular area, it can
be the right choice to go to a college or university that focuses
on that area. Also, sometimes it can be a really good experience to
go to a smaller college rather than a large university for a degree
in science, because there is much more emphasis on teaching
and students often get to spend more time with their professors
at a smaller college. You have to do a lot of exploring, and then
go visit campuses, to find out what place is right for you!

September 11, 2002
A: FROM MENTOR JOAN LUSK. CLICK HERE FOR BIO.
I suppose you've noticed that many colleges and universities offer
many different degree programs in many sciences. So I'm wondering if
your question asks whether a college, as opposed to a
research-oriented university, is a good place to start studying
science. Colleges in fact have a good record of preparing future
scientists, who go on to earn advanced degrees at universities and
become faculty or researchers in industry or government labs.

Statistics published some years ago (I can't find them now) bore out
my claim, though many scientists at research universities didn't want
to believe it. They think that the opportunities for undergraduates
at universities to get involved in "real" research projects should
make them want to become scientists themselves. Sometimes that
happens. But the greater attention that faculty at colleges tend to
pay to their students may be a bigger factor in encouraging them to
go on to careers in science. Perhaps faculty at colleges aren't
doing research on the cutting edge; but an undergraduate who has a
satisfying, stimulating research experience on a project of less
earth-shaking importance is more likely to go on with science than
one who has a less satisfying experience surrounded by more
high-powered scientists. Or so the figures seemed to imply. And
many colleges do have excellent science labs and science teachers.

If by "college for science" you mean a college where you will be free
to ignore everything but science - well, I can't encourage you to
look for such a place. There are so many other things to learn, and
using ones elective courses to become at least minimally educated in
the arts and social sciences gives one so much more to enjoy later in
life - even as a practicing scientist.

END