Q: (Initially posted on April 30, 2003) FROM
MENTEE ALEXIS K. IN VA
Science, tech and engineering careers seem to need team working
type people.
In school we do all kinds of "group work" and it is
usually a big pain.
Group work is a pain because everyone is given the same grade
for the final
project and teachers do not care if people in the group did
their share (or
did it well) or not. All it takes is one person to mess it up.
I don't
want my grade to suffer because someone else doesn't want to
work.
Sometimes I get tired of doing other peoples work in group projects
and am
not happy when I see them get a grade that I earned. I noticed
that
teachers usually try to mix hard working students with not motivated
people
and also "smart" people with people who struggle.
I think that I get put
into the position to be the teacher so the teacher doesn't have
to teach. I
actually like to teach, but I don't like doing the teachers
work and I don't
like trying to earn the grade for more than myself because I
have to
compensate for others or pay the price for their unwillingness
to their
part. I also love to be in groups with people who are motivated
and want to
contribute and try to contribute even if what they give is less
than someone
else, but I am tired of being in unbalanced groups. I think
that it should
be illegal for teachers to make kids do teacher work. Has anyone
else
noticed that teachers get their own salaries and their own promotions
and
their own jobs and their own evaluations and stuff like that
without paying
the price for other teachers good or bad work? They don't suffer
the
consequences of other teachers not doing their job. I don't
think that a
teachers evaluation report card has "grades" that
are based on other peoples
work. Okay, there is a question in all this. Maybe two. Maybe
more! If
team work is so important in SET stuff, when you have a project
to do with
other people, does everyone really do what they are supposed
to do? Do
people try to take credit for your ideas or your work? Do people
not do what
they are supposed to but then try to say that they did do their
work? Well,
I guess I want to know that this school group work will actually
stop being
such a problem and if it will, when? In college? Later? Am I
the only one
who thinks group work in school is usually a stinky deal? Or
that group work
doesn't build character but gets everyone crabby with each other
and can
just end up giving you a bad grade you didn't earn? |
|
May 1, 2003
A: FROM MENTOR BARB KONTOGIANNIS
IN CO
Ah, group work. It is a reality in industry. However, unlike
in
school, it becomes very clear who is not completing their
part of the
effort, and not everyone receives the same "grade."
It does take everyone's
piece of the puzzle to complete the project, but the group
dynamics will be
a little different than the assigned groups in schoolwork.
I can't say you
will never encounter "slackers" in your college
days or professional career,
but I would venture that it gets better. By the time you are
in college,
the students there want to be there, and like you, want to
succeed. You
will run into people that try to take credit for your ideas
or work, but not
very often. You'll have to stand up for yourself, and diplomatically
handle
the situation. Believe it or not, the experiences you have
now will help
you learn how to handle situations later in your studies and
career. Hang
it there - it'll never be perfect, but it should get better.
And discuss your dilemma with your teachers - they may have
some insights
for you, and would also appreciate your perspective on the
team situations.
********************
A: FROM MENTOR CAROL TOMAN
IN IL
We didn't do as much group work when I was in school as I
see my
daughter doing now. She would agree totally with your frustration
about unfairly carrying the load. In the work world, most
jobs must
be done in teams. Sometimes the teams are tightly tied together
and
on a short deadline similar to your school experiences. Other
times
the day-to-day tasks are more independent but eventually your
bigger
success is dependent on other people getting their work done.
Here
are the key differences I see between your experiences and
the working
world: 1) You don't get a "grade" for each project
you do.
Performance is evaluated over a longer period and multiple
aspects of
your work so a truer, fairer picture of your contributions
stands out
over time. 2) Because you get to know the abilities of the
other
people you work with, assignments do not get divided evenly.
The most
able people willingly take a disproportionate share of the
work. They
earn their good reputations. But let's also be realistic.
Politics
and emotions do drive some behavior in the workplace. Some
people
will try to take credit when it is not due. Others will maneuver
into
high visibility jobs whether they can do the work or not.
People like
this still get under my skin, but I'm much better now at getting
over
it pretty quickly and I have faith that most of the people
around me
also recognize the fakers. I always try to apply two axioms
in my
work: 1) readily admit when I don't know something and immediately
offer to find out or learn about it, and 2) "take the
blame and share
the credit". People appreciate these behaviors very much
and respect
the people that can live by them. Sometimes these feel bad
in the
short term, but one's reputation is built over the long term.
********************
A: FROM MENTOR NATALIE GIVANS
IN VA
I have worked in a consulting firm for 19 years and have always
participated as sometimes leader of, sometimes follower within,
and
sometimes peer of many other staff in work groups. There is
almost no
project where you work by yourself in our field because most
projects
need many staff with many skills to do the job right and to
provide the
absolute best value and outcome to the clients. I would agree
that
there is always an initial concern staff have about whether
they will be
recognized for their own skills and ideas, whether the team
will achieve
the goals on time, and whether everyone will pull their weight.
In our
business, it is the job of the staff to contribute and make
a difference
while it is the job of the team leader to ensure everyone
gets air time
for their ideas, everyone gets appropriate credit, the team
succeeds,
and that everyone carries their weight. the team leader counsels
staff
who are not being team players and will reassign them if they
don't do
their job to support the team.
It's harder in school where work groups don't usually have
a designated
leader whom everyone will listen to and take direction from.
However,
you can try having a "kick-off" meeting within a
work group to identify
roles and responsibilities, expectations, schedules and deadlines,
and
how to solve problems if some arise (which they always do).
Having a
set of expectations and rules ahead of time, that everyone
buys into
(maybe even "signs" a contract with each other)
can help when the
inevitable 11th hour efforts kick in and emotions can be high.
********************
A: FROM MENTOR LEE
PELLEGRINO-GENSEY IN NJ
One of the things I like about working in science is that
the intelligence
and motivation level of the people I work with is much higher
than the
average of the general public that you would meet in a retail
job or
interact with in school. As in every job, you will probably
run into people
who just want to coast and participate minimally, but with
good management
their lack of contribution will not pull down your rewards
(salary, bonuses,
and publications rather than grades). Overall, the people
who are in these
SET jobs are here because they really wanted to be, so they
have the
motivation. Hang in there - you will find that college is
an improvement on
your current situation, grad school weeds out slackers even
more, and by the
time you get into your SET job you will find the high level
of motivation
and work ethic in your coworkers that you yourself already
possess. Don't
lose that!
|