|
A: FROM MENTOR BRENDA WOLFE IN CO
Dear Francisca -
I am not a Physics person, but it is my opinion that unless you have had two years of Calculous - it is a waste of time to pursue more Physics in High School. No matter how you do on the IB test - you will need to take Physics in college where it is taught using Calculous as the base.
I am surprised that you were allowed to take Physics as a Freshman. I'm not sure when you plan to take the IB test - but I would wait to take more Physics until closer to that time- so that everything is fresher in your mind.
I would suggest that instead of the Biology - you should take Chemistry. All engineers still have to take a few courses in Chemistry.
********************
A: FROM MENTOR JOAN LUSK IN RI
No insult intended to the field of economics, but for a prospective
engineer physics is definitely more important. In addition to the obvious
relevance of the subject matter, colleges often have two introductory
physics courses, one for the well-prepared science/engineering major, and
you'd get a leg up by having a better background. Furthermore, physics
will use your math, and using it will strengthen it like any
muscle! Advanced economics is highly mathematical too, but I don't think a
course in high school is likely to be; and colleges don't expect incoming
students to already have taken math as much as they expecting incoming
science/engineering majors to have taken physics.
I think it's less important to take any one particular subject test for
entry to college; you can only take a few, not hit _all_ your bases. If
you're applying to colleges that use an AP physics test or the SAT subject
test for placement into a better physics course, then it might matter.
Good luck whatever you decide to do! There is still time to learn lots in
college that isn't even offered at your high school.
|