Infectious
Diseases
Malarone
Case Study
In
the mid 1990s it had been established that malarone, a combination
of atoquaone and proguanil is highly effective and safe for
the treatment of Plasmodium falciparium malaria. The drug
company has an interest in establishing whether this drug
is also effective at preventing malaria. They therefore propose
the following study.
Around
300 children, ages 4-16 from a Public School in an African
country will be recruited. Written informed consent from the
parents will be sought. The recruited group will be randomized
to a treatment group or to a placebo group. Children who sleep
under bed nets will be excluded from the study. Because of
the expected high rate of parasitaemia in these children,
they will receive an initial curative regimen with malarone
for the first three days of the study. After this curative
phase they will be given malarone or placebo for 12 weeks.
Tablets will be given once a day with a fatty meal by a field
worker. Body temperature and thick blood smears will be taken
weakly, and assessment for adverse event done daily. Blood
smears will alos be done within 24 hours in case malaria is
suspected. In case of a positive blood smear a second one
will be done and assessed independently of the first by at
least two medical investigators.
After
the initial 12 weeks, the participants will be followed up
for another 4 weeks, and thick blood smears and reporting
of adverse events done weekly.
The
primary endpoint of the study will be a positive blood smear.
Children
diagnosed with malaria will be promptly treated by available
antimalarial drugs and withdrawn from the study.
Critics
of the study argue that this trial is unethical because the
population will not benefit from the results of the study:
They live in a malaria endemic area where drug prophylaxis
is not medically indicated. The primary beneficiaries of this
study will be travelers from rich countries visiting developing
countries.
The
trial sponsors point out that the trial represents no risks
to the participants because of the safeguards. In a similar
trial in another country, no serious adverse events have been
recorded. Furthermore, the children in the trial will received
better care than is otherwise available to them.
The
local government strongly supports the trial, and in fact
does not understand why the local research ethics committee
has any reservations.