There are 2 propositions to be considered:
- Proposition A: Qualitative methods are less rigorous than quantitative methods and should only be used to support findings derived from good qualitative data.
- Proposition B: Qualitative methods are in and of themselves just as scientifically valid as quantitative methods (no less rigorous). In many cases, they can "stand alone" as part of the chain of evidence for assessing particular health issues.
How would you respond to these differing propositions? Should findings based on qualitative (as opposed to quantitative) methods be treated differently when assessing community health and setting objectives for community action?
Responses:
PH 425 Conferencing Exercises last updated April 12, 2004 (epowell)